On Sunday, MSNBC’s Chuck Todd cornered Adam Schiff for giving credibility to the Steele Dossier for the past 4 years.
Earlier this week, even the far-left Washington Post ate crow, retracting their reporting about the Dossier. They went as far as to say they can no longer “stand by the accuracy”.
Before getting into the issue, Todd played old clips of Schiff heaping praise on the Dossier before asking him if he had any regrets.
“As chair of the House intelligence committee, do you regret giving credibility to the Steele dossier before anybody had been able to verify anything in that. A lot of those clips were done before there was any good verification. Look, there are some news organizations who made the mistake of publishing this dossier without verifying it. That is a separate conversation for those news organizations. But you helped give it credibility, do you regret it?,” Todd asked.
“I don’t regret saying that we should investigate claims of someone who was a respected British intelligence officer” Schiff replied, completely dodging the question.
Watch below:
CHUCK TODD: “Do you regret giving credibility to the Steele dossier?”
ADAM SCHIFF: “I don’t” pic.twitter.com/FdCZCoQ4Gq
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) November 14, 2021
As I mentioned above, the Washington Post even had to walk back some of their bogus reporting about the Dossier.
According to their new update, they have “corrected and removed parts of two stories”. This change comes after new revelations showed large portions of the Dossier were either debunked or originated from political insiders close to Hillary Clinton and other members of the Democrat Party.
“The Washington Post on Friday took the unusual step of correcting and removing large portions of two articles, published in March 2017 and February 2019, that had identified a Belarusian American businessman as a key source of the ‘Steele dossier,’ a collection of largely unverified reports that claimed the Russian government had compromising information about then-candidate Donald Trump,” they write.
“The newspaper’s executive editor, Sally Buzbee, said The Post could no longer stand by the accuracy of those elements of the story. It had identified businessman Sergei Millian as ‘Source D,’ the unnamed figure who passed on the most salacious allegation in the dossier to its principal author, former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele,” they add.
Read their full “correction” here…
Sadly, no “reckoning” will be had because the Washington Post is backed up by the elite media and big money.
The only way they will ever be held accountable is if the American people start waking up by the millions. Americans must realize that outlets like the Washington Post will lie, cheat and steal to get their way.
"*" indicates required fields
