Recent remarks by political figures highlight a glaring hypocrisy regarding the preservation of American history. Many who applauded the removal of statues commemorating historical figures like Abraham Lincoln and Thomas Jefferson now express alarm at plans by the Trump administration to revise content at the Smithsonian museums ahead of America’s 250th anniversary in 2026. For instance, Tim Walz, the governor of Minnesota, criticized efforts to ensure that American exceptionalism is represented in museum narratives, lamenting, “If you’re trying to erase history, you’re on the wrong side of it.” However, this sentiment rings hollow, considering his silence during the 2020 protests that led to the destruction of the Christopher Columbus statue in Minnesota.
During that chaotic time, a mob dismantled the Columbus statue without any due process, an act described in a 2022 Smithsonian Magazine article that called the vandalism a “beautiful thing.” This one-sided portrayal is indicative of a broader trend in cultural narratives pushed by progressives. The Smithsonian Magazine failed to include any voices supporting the statue, revealing an agenda that neglects a balanced account of history.
The Smithsonians, despite their esteemed reputation, have shifted toward a leftist slant that often reduces America’s historical significance. For example, the museum’s display about Cuban immigration blames U.S. actions while conveniently omitting the role of Fidel Castro. They seem to promote the notion that American history is intrinsically flawed and rooted in oppression. This selective historical narrative raises critical questions about who dictates how the American story is told.
A significant portion of the American populace agrees with the need for a balanced historical perspective. A recent poll indicates only 37% of Democrats believe there is nothing to celebrate as the nation approaches its 250th birthday. The pervasive influence of elites in academia has undermined the broader understanding of America’s contributions and successes. Changes in historical perception can also be seen over time, as interpretations of events like the Crusades have shifted based on contemporary perspectives.
The current stance seems to suggest that patriotism has no place in museums, a contradiction to their original purpose. Changes proposed by the Trump administration promise to be transparent, offering a platform for diverse viewpoints on history. This stands in stark contrast to the episodes of 2020, where history was effectively rewritten by mobs acting outside the law. As conversations grow around America’s narrative, many across the country welcome the opportunity for a national debate, fearing that a one-sided discourse has taken too firm a hold on our cultural institutions.
"*" indicates required fields
