Former Attorney General Bill Barr’s deposition before the House Oversight Committee lasted over four hours, showcasing contrasting views among lawmakers. Representatives Jasmine Crockett and Suhas Subramanyam, both Democrats, expressed dissatisfaction, stating they were left with “more questions now” than before the session. They criticized the Republican line of questioning, suggesting it lacked depth and urgency regarding the victims of the Epstein case.
In sharp contrast, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, the sole Republican present, conveyed a more positive assessment. He stated Barr “shed a lot of light” on the Epstein investigation, asserting that he answered all the questions posed. Comer emphasized that their conduct aimed at transparency and encouraged bipartisan efforts on the matter.
Subramanyam further articulated his disappointment, implying that Republicans were not genuinely pursuing the truth. He remarked, “It doesn’t seem like this is something where they are truly caring about the victims.” Crockett echoed this sentiment by suggesting the Republicans were merely “going through the motions.” Their criticism points to a perceived lack of commitment from the GOP to address the issue thoroughly.
Comer countered these claims, alleging that Democrats were politicizing the investigation, which he characterized as focusing on “horrific crimes against young girls.” He accused them of constructing a “false narrative” regarding ties between Trump and Epstein, especially after Subramanyam hinted at the possibility of a cover-up by Trump’s allies.
In his testimony, Barr reportedly distanced Trump from any involvement, stating he had never communicated with the former president regarding Epstein and had not seen evidence implicating him in any wrongdoing. A source familiar with Barr’s deposition highlighted that he believed the Biden Department of Justice would have released any incriminating evidence if it existed. This assertion supports Barr’s position that there is a lack of evidence connecting Trump to the case.
As the investigation unfolds, Barr’s testimony stands as the first in a series scheduled by the committee, which also includes other former officials. The response from both sides indicates a significant rift in how this inquiry is perceived, raising questions about the path forward as these legislators continue to navigate the complex issues surrounding Epstein’s case.
"*" indicates required fields
