Investigators have reopened a significant chapter in Tennessee’s law enforcement history with startling accusations against the late Sheriff Buford Pusser, long heralded as a heroic figure. Nearly 60 years after the tragic death of his wife, Pauline, authorities now allege that Pusser may have been her killer. This shocking development raises difficult questions about the narrative that has enveloped his legacy, including the popular “Walking Tall” films inspired by his life.
According to the Buford Pusser Home and Museum, the couple’s story began on that fateful day in 1967. They were reportedly driving through McNairy County when they were ambushed—gunfire erupted, striking Pauline fatally in the head while Pusser survived a shot to his face. Yet, during a press conference on Friday, Mark Davidson, the District Attorney for the 25th Judicial District, suggested that the events Pusser described may not have actually occurred as he claimed.
Davidson presented findings from a reopened 1,000-page case file, which began its examination in 2022 under the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation’s new cold case initiative. Included in this investigation were forensic analyses that painted a different picture. The DA asserted, “The blood spatter on the hood outside of the vehicle contradicts Buford Pusser’s statements.” He suggested that Pauline was likely shot outside the vehicle, and pointed to evidence suggesting that the wound to Pusser’s cheek could have been self-inflicted. This evidence represents a significant departure from the long-accepted narrative surrounding this case.
Further revelations surfaced during the Friday briefing. Tennessee Bureau of Investigation Director David Rausch indicated that inconsistencies within Pusser’s account have fueled the ongoing inquiry. Forensic analyses and ballistic testing presented a series of contradictions, particularly regarding the crime scene and the specifics of Pauline’s autopsy results. Davidson noted, “Pauline’s head wound wasn’t consistent with the crime-scene photographs of the car,” aligning with insights from medical examiner Dr. Michael Revelle.
Pauline’s brother, Griffon Mullins, expressed feelings of deep regret following the emergence of this new evidence. “I knew, deep down, there were problems in her marriage,” Mullins stated, reflecting on past concerns about her safety. He expressed a painful wish that he could have acted differently at that time, acknowledging his belief that if he had known what he does now, his sister might have avoided returning to Tennessee.
The family’s emotional toll is underscored by a statement from Madison Garrison Bush, the couple’s granddaughter. While she did not have the opportunity to know her grandparents, she voiced a heartfelt defense of her late grandfather. “A dead man, who cannot defend himself, is being accused of an unspeakable crime,” Bush remarked. She conveyed her frustration about the reconsideration of events that her family has long endured, stating, “What I do know is my family has endured traumatic loss that few can comprehend.” Bush emphasized that their family has already faced considerable pain and loss due to Pusser’s law enforcement career and echoed a desire not to reopen old wounds.
This investigation reflects not just a longstanding mystery but also the complexity of human relationships and the often murky nature of truth within personal and public narratives. Sheriff Pusser, once celebrated as a figure of justice, now finds himself retracing a path shadowed by doubt. The implications of these recent findings may resonate deeply within the community and raise questions about the legends we choose to believe—or reject—in the context of personal tragedy.
"*" indicates required fields
