“Cashless bail” is a phrase that has gained traction in political conversations, yet it largely misrepresents the realities at play in the criminal justice system. This misleading term, popularized by reform advocates and amplified by media, obscures the factual description of what is being proposed. In truth, the system operates on secured bail—a constitutionally supported, privately funded method that guarantees defendants show up for court while protecting the public, all without placing a financial burden on taxpayers.
Calling it “cashless” implies something beneficial, but the reality diverges sharply. The system accepts all payment forms and takes financial responsibility for the defendants. This includes making payroll, paying taxes, and even tracking fugitives when necessary. It’s an operation that runs around the clock, ensuring accountability and public safety. Yet, since New Jersey enacted the Bail Reform Act in 2016—removing the right to bail—the consequences have grown dire. Individuals like Ed Forchion, a Marine veteran, found themselves trapped in a lengthy detention, held for 447 days without bail for a charge that was not even violent.
The shift in New Jersey’s bail system has led to staggering financial implications. Counties have sued the state due to unexpected funding shortages. Residents pay millions yearly for a bureaucratic approach that has proven less effective than the previous system it replaced. The trend shows no sign of stopping, with Tennessee on a similar path and other states eyeing these changes. Stripping away the right to bail has long-term repercussions, making restoration nearly impossible. Accountability shifts from private interests, who have a stake in outcomes, to public expense that leaves taxpayers to foot the bill for an ineffective system.
Critics of the “bail reform” movement argue that politicians lack a true understanding of the implications of these changes. They pursue narratives driven by funding and minimal accountability. As a result, public safety suffers, with the legal rights of the accused hanging in the balance. “Cashless bail” doesn’t aim to improve fairness; it replaces a working system with potentially costlier government oversight.
Defending the Eighth Amendment and the right to bail becomes crucial as states consider dismantling long-standing practices. A balanced approach exists, combining judicial discretion with public safety and ensuring financial responsibility remains out of taxpayers’ hands. It’s essential to recognize the role of private enterprise in creating an effective criminal justice system. Those involved in secured bail are the backbone, performing necessary work even amidst the debate. Without proactive measures, costs will rise, public accountability will diminish, and victims will continue to seek justice in an increasingly complicated landscape.
"*" indicates required fields
