Newly declassified memos reveal that former FBI Director James Comey allegedly authorized classified leaks just before the 2016 election. This revelation has stirred significant controversy, particularly because federal prosecutors declined to pursue charges based on evidence gathered from high-ranking FBI officials.
The memos, obtained by Just The News, detail a U.S. Postal Inspection Service investigation that implicated Comey’s top aides, James Baker and Chief of Staff James Rybicki. They disclosed sensitive information to The New York Times in October 2016. One memo states, “Baker indicated FBI Chief of Staff James Rybicki instructed him to disclose the information to the NYT.” This statement suggests that Baker believed he was acting under Comey’s direction.
The recent disclosures contradict Comey’s previous testimony before Congress. The memos, which were initially redacted by the Justice Department, later received scrutiny from Attorney General Pam Bondi, who facilitated their release to congressional committees. This shift in transparency has drawn attention to possible misconduct among senior FBI leadership.
In a broader context, these leaks are not isolated incidents. It’s already known that Comey authorized specific leaks to further agendas, such as when his associate Daniel Richman leaked classified information to promote a special counsel investigation in 2017. Nearly a year after these interactions, Robert Mueller was appointed to investigate alleged collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russian operatives.
The public outcry surrounding these revelations reflects a growing demand for accountability. As Kash Patel noted, “Thanks to President Trump’s push for transparency, the cover-up is finally being exposed.” The implications of these memos suggest a calculated effort by FBI officials to influence the political landscape during a pivotal election year.
These developments will undoubtedly fuel ongoing discussions about the integrity of federal institutions. As scrutiny increases, it raises questions about how justice can be fairly administered in cases involving powerful figures within the government. The fallout from these disclosures is sure to reverberate in political and legal circles for some time.
"*" indicates required fields