Last week, Democrat strategists made headlines when they released a list of so-called “woke words” that they advise party members to avoid if they want to secure victories in upcoming elections. This recommendation raised eyebrows among many on the right, who argued that it illustrated the Democrats’ lasting relationship with what they deem “woke nonsense.” As evidence of this relationship, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) recently opened its summer meeting in Minneapolis with a land acknowledgment that declared the area to be “stolen land.” This move is indicative of a broader trend within the party that appears resistant to change despite declining approval ratings.
During the event, Lindy Sowmick, treasurer of the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, delivered the land acknowledgment with a notable emphasis on historical injustices. She asserted, “The DNC acknowledges and honors the Dakota Oyate – the Dakota people – who are the original stewards of the lands and waters of Minneapolis.” Sowmick highlighted the deep-rooted connection the Dakota people have with the land, stating, “The Dakota cared for the lands, lakes and the Wakpa Tanka – the ‘Great River,’ the Mississippi River – for thousands of years before colonization.” This acknowledgment went further, suggesting that the U.S. perpetuates a system that suppresses Indigenous histories and cultures.
Despite the aim to highlight historical injustices, this gesture has drawn criticism. Skeptics question the sincerity of such acknowledgments, arguing that if Democrats genuinely believed in the premise of these statements, they would contemplate returning the land in question to its original stewards. “It’s all just virtue signaling,” a common refrain among critics, captures the sentiment that such proclamations serve more as a checkbox than a meaningful action to address past wrongs.
The reluctance of Democrats to distance themselves from these narratives is evident in their persistent messaging. Even as approval numbers plunge, the party continues to attach itself to these concepts, seemingly unable or unwilling to adapt. The repeated calls for recognition of historical grievances may appease certain factions within the party but appear disconnected from broader voter concerns.
As the DNC navigates this complex landscape, it remains to be seen how effective such tactics will be moving forward. Will the focus on identity politics and historical grievances resonate with a critical mass of voters, or will it further alienate those who yearn for a more unifying approach? This dilemma could define Democrats’ outreach as they strive to regain footing in a competitive political environment.
"*" indicates required fields
