The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) stirred conversation with a recent statement comparing the term “undocumented immigrant” to the use of “they/them” pronouns. In a direct tweet, DHS made it clear: “DHS has no interest in the left’s open borders pronouns.” This position emphasizes DHS’s preference for the legally recognized term “alien” when discussing individuals who enter the U.S. unlawfully.
In its statement, DHS argued that “illegal” is the only accurate description for those breaking the law. They humorously suggested that using euphemisms might lead to absurd terms like “undocumented houseguests” for burglars. The mention of federal laws using “alien” reinforces their stance, highlighting terms within several sections of U.S. Code where illegal immigrants are classified as “inadmissible aliens” or “deportable aliens.” DHS stated, “Alien is the technical legal term, and that is what DHS will use,” reinforcing the argument that language surrounding immigration should be rooted in legal accuracy.
The issue of language and its implications has sparked considerable debate, as seen in a recent incident involving a high school student in North Carolina who was suspended for using the term “alien.” His question about whether the term referred to “space aliens or illegal aliens” was deemed racially insensitive, leading to a lawsuit by his family for First Amendment violations. This scenario underscores the tension between evolving language norms and traditional legal definitions.
Critics argue that changing language shapes perceptions of immigration and the associated laws. The term “undocumented immigrant” has been criticized as a deliberate attempt to soften the reality of illegal entry into the country. This aligns with a broader discourse on how terminology can influence public opinion and policy.
With this statement, DHS not only affirmed its commitment to legal terminology but also highlighted the ongoing complexities of immigration discourse in America today. Such divisions in language usage reflect deeper ideological clashes, where every word carries weight in shaping the national narrative on immigration.
"*" indicates required fields
