Florida Lieutenant Governor Jay Collins recently made headlines with his sharp critique of California Governor Gavin Newsom. The controversy stems from a tragic incident in Florida where three lives were lost in a crash involving an illegal immigrant trucker who obtained a commercial driver’s license in California. Collins pointed to Newsom’s policies as the root cause of this tragedy, declaring, “Three lives lost because of Gavin Newsom, because of California’s failed policies. We’re done with that s—.”
Collins articulated that the trucker, Harjinder Singh, had crossed the border illegally and managed to get a CDL despite significant deficiencies in English comprehension, which were highlighted during his interrogation following the crash. “That thug fled back here because he knew these policies would defend him,” Collins remarked, emphasizing his belief that such immigration policies endanger American citizens.
The narrative quickly escalated, with Collins framing the issue as a broader failure of leadership. He questioned how many more lives would be at risk due to illegal immigration, gangs, and substance abuse, particularly fentanyl-related deaths. He expressed frustration at Newsom’s priorities, claiming, “Gavin Newsom continues to care more about tweets and what goes out on social media than taking care of American citizens.”
In the midst of these accusations, Newsom’s team responded, calling attention to a significant counter-narrative. They asserted that Florida law enforcement let a “murder suspect walk,” and it was only due to California’s intervention that Singh was apprehended. The tone from Newsom’s office was equally combative, framing Collins’ visit to California as a publicity stunt.
During his visit, Collins showcased his determination to bring Singh back to Florida. He rejected the label of a typical politician, identifying instead as a “God-fearing, gun-loving, freedom-defending, one-legged, retired Green Beret.” This declaration illustrates his commitment to both his role and his mission, perhaps appealing to a sense of duty and patriotism that resonates with many.
This exchange between state leaders underscores a growing rift over immigration policies and public safety, with each side casting the other in an unfavorable light. Collins’s remarks reflect a profound belief in state responsibility for the safety of its citizens, while Newsom challenges the characterization of his policies as detrimental. As these discussions unfold, they reveal not just a clash of personalities but a critical debate around immigration and governance.
"*" indicates required fields
