A man from Frisco, Texas, faces serious legal consequences after allegedly firing a gun at three teenage boys who were participating in a TikTok challenge. The shooting incident occurred on July 28, 2025, when Damon Wolfe reportedly shot at the teens after they knocked on his door and quickly ran away, part of a popular prank dubbed “ding-dong ditching.” According to a Frisco Police Department news release, Wolfe was taken into custody on August 7 and charged with aggravated assault, a second-degree felony.
Frisco Police Chief David Shilson expressed concern over the potential hazards of such pranks. “Parents please talk to your kids about the dangers of participating in these types of TikTok challenges,” he urged. Chief Shilson emphasized, “The teens involved in this case are very fortunate they were not shot and killed or seriously injured.” His remarks highlight the delicate balance between youth pranks and the unpredictable responses they can elicit from homeowners.
The night of the incident, Wolfe reported hearing loud banging at his front door. In a panic, he ran into the street and fired at a vehicle carrying the fleeing teenage boys. Responding to calls about gunfire, police discovered bullet holes in the boys’ vehicle. Initially, the teens were not forthcoming with details, claiming they had been in a different area when the shooting occurred. However, they soon admitted to the prank that had triggered Wolfe’s reaction.
Chief Shilson made it clear that homeowners need to understand the legal ramifications of their actions. He stated, “For homeowners, it is important to understand that there are legal and criminal consequences for running outside and shooting at a vehicle fleeing the scene. The bullets fired in this offense could have easily struck neighbors’ houses and had deadly consequences.” His comments serve as a warning that gunfire can lead to tragic outcomes, not only for those directly involved but also for innocent bystanders.
In this instance, the minors were not charged, as no damage occurred to Wolfe’s property. Shilson cautioned against the risks associated with such pranks: “It’s just a different time today. Homeowners, they hear something loud beating on their front door, they’re scared, and you don’t know how people will respond and you don’t know who lives in that house.” With these words, he underscores the unpredictable nature of escalating situations, particularly in the context of a prank that may seem harmless to the teens but could provoke fear in an adult.
Should Wolfe be convicted, he faces a prison sentence of up to 20 years and a possible fine of $10,000. The severity of the charges reflects the serious nature of discharging a firearm in a residential area, particularly towards individuals fleeing the scene of a prank.
This incident draws unsettling parallels to a prior case in California where three teenagers lost their lives after a similar prank. In that situation, the driver involved deliberately rammed their vehicle off the road, leading to the tragic deaths of the teens. The harsh realities of today’s world remind us that seemingly innocent actions can spiral into life-altering consequences.
As this case unfolds, it raises important questions about youth behavior in the age of social media and the responsibilities of parents to guide their children. The message is clear: while pranks may seem innocent, they can trigger unforeseen and dangerous reactions from others. It is crucial to weigh the risks associated with participation in social media challenges that encourage such behavior.
"*" indicates required fields
