Experts warn that humanity may face dire challenges in the coming decades, with predictions of existential threats looming over society. Toby Ord, in his book “The Precipice,” outlines a startling one-in-six chance of catastrophe this century, driven by dangers such as artificial intelligence. Similarly, Nick Bostrom’s research points to a median estimate of 19 percent for human extinction resulting from various global catastrophic risks. This trend is troubling when viewed alongside Jared Diamond’s prediction, which gives humanity a 50-50 chance of survival past 2050, based on the collapse patterns of past civilizations.
Throughout history, civilizations have fallen for repeatable reasons. Luke Kemp’s extensive analysis of over 400 societies spanning 5,000 years reveals that inequality and elite overreach often lead to collapse. Diamond also notes that environmental degradation, climate change, and poor societal responses frequently contribute to these downfalls. These historical patterns suggest that today’s global interconnectedness could amplify the consequences, potentially leaving little room for recovery.
The threat of nuclear weapons remains alarming, with about 10,000 warheads distributed among nations such as the United States, Russia, and China. Recent assessments have positioned the risk of nuclear conflict alongside crises stemming from climate change and artificial intelligence, causing the Doomsday Clock to tick closer to midnight than ever. Moreover, engineered pandemics and biological threats have entered the equation, with the potential for rapid spread due to global travel.
Kemp underscores the unprecedented pace of climate change, now occurring at ten times the rate of historical extinction events. He warns that by 2070, around two billion people may endure extreme heat, drastically reducing land suitable for key crops. While developing regions may face the brunt of these changes, some experts suggest that subsistence farming in Africa might alleviate certain food shortages.
Artificial intelligence introduces additional peril. Experts emphasize the dangers of misalignment and unintended consequences inherent in unchecked AI development. In 2023, influential leaders in the AI sector expressed concern for the technology’s potential to inflict harm if not carefully managed. RAND’s 2025 research has further examined how AI could exacerbate existing nuclear and biological threats.
The specter of solar flares, comparable to the Carrington Event of 1859, poses a significant risk as well, with a staggering one-in-ten chance of occurrence each decade. Such an event could disrupt power grids and communications, leading to extensive blackouts lasting for weeks or more. Additionally, methods like stratospheric aerosol injection, which could potentially cool the atmosphere, come laden with risks, including ozone depletion and altered rainfall patterns. If such interventions are abruptly halted, they may exacerbate warming through termination shock, contributing to unpredictable global effects.
As these multifaceted risks converge, experts continue to call for robust preparedness strategies. Wealthy individuals have begun to take extreme measures in anticipation of potential societal collapse. Some, like Peter Thiel, have invested in land in New Zealand, while Sam Altman has made similar evacuation plans. Mark Zuckerberg is reportedly building a fortified residence, signaling a troubling trend among the tech elite. These private fortifications starkly contrast with broader societal preparedness, highlighting disparities in resilience planning.
In conclusion, the intermingling threats posed by nuclear weapons, climate change, and artificial intelligence require immediate and thoughtful responses to avert potential extinction events. The weight of these challenges cannot be understated, as humanity grapples with the consequences of its past decisions and current trajectory.
"*" indicates required fields
