Kari Lake is pushing back hard against a federal judge’s ruling that blocks her attempt to fire Michael Abramowitz, the director of Voice of America (VOA). This setback comes as Lake aims to streamline the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), which oversees VOA. Abramowitz’s resistance is rooted in the regulatory framework that requires a confirmation process involving an advisory board, which is currently vacant due to President Donald Trump’s removal of its members in January. U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth, a Reagan appointee, upheld Abramowitz’s stance, citing the “practical barrier” posed by the board’s lack of members for removing the director.
In response to the ruling, Lake remains defiant. “We fully intend to appeal this absurd ruling,” she insisted. Her determination shines through as she refers to her role in overseeing USAGM as interim director, a position that puts her in the crosshairs of powerful institutional forces. “Elections have consequences, and President Trump runs the executive branch,” she remarked in a statement, asserting her belief that constitutional processes will ultimately vindicate her position, despite Lamberth’s current ruling.
Abramowitz has been on paid leave since March, with his salary reported to be approximately $380,000 in 2024, a figure that has sparked criticism as Lake attempts to reduce the agency’s staff. She argues that her efforts are necessary to address what she describes as a bureaucratic “monster.” In her view, the agency has strayed from its intended mission and needs to be restructured urgently.
The tensions escalated when Lake indicated that Abramowitz was notified of his impending termination after he declined a job offer at a North Carolina broadcasting station. This move sparked a lawsuit from Abramowitz against Lake, further complicating her mission. Lamberth, in his ruling, has cast doubt on her plans to downsize the agency, suggesting that they verge on contempt of court. His remarks underscore the uphill battle Lake faces as she works to implement her vision for USAGM.
Lake has not held back in voicing her frustrations over the ruling. “Of course I’ve got a judge here in Washington, D.C. — I’ve got five cases against me as I try to scale this monster, this beast back and rightsize it,” she stated. The implications of this conflict extend beyond individual employment issues to a larger debate about the direction of international broadcast media funded by taxpayers.
Importantly, Lake’s criticism of VOA is not without context. Reports from previous years have indicated troubling connections between VOA’s Mandarin service managers and the Chinese government, raising questions about the agency’s alignment with American values and interests. These revelations provide a backdrop for Lake’s aggressive approach to reforming VOA as she seeks to redirect its efforts toward true representation of democracy.
As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how the legal dynamics will play out. Lake remains steadfast in her pursuit of change within a system resistant to her vision of reform, with an appeal against the judge’s ruling as her next strategic move. In the face of legal challenges and the inertia of entrenched bureaucracy, the stakes are high for both her and the integrity of a major federal agency.
"*" indicates required fields
