Democratic leaders who celebrated the removal of statues of American icons like Abraham Lincoln and Thomas Jefferson in 2020 now express chagrin over the Trump administration’s push to reshape the Smithsonian museums. This sudden concern raises eyebrows. Tim Walz, the governor of Minnesota, took to social media this week to voice his disapproval. He stated, “If you’re trying to erase history, you’re on the wrong side of it.” Yet, one must question: where was this outrage when protestors toppled a 90-year-old statue of Christopher Columbus in his state? That destruction was a chaotic act by an angry mob devoid of due process.
In a revealing article published by Smithsonian Magazine, the vandalism was portrayed positively, with an Ojibwe woman remarking that taking down the statue was “a beautiful thing.” The article failed to present any perspective from those who valued Columbus, effectively showing a one-sided narrative. This selective storytelling exemplifies the very bias that the Trump administration aims to address.
The Smithsonian has long been a cherished institution, yet its shift towards a progressive agenda is evident. The glaring omission of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas from the African American History Museum solidifies concerns about historical representation. For decades, progressives have maintained strong control over cultural narratives, often portraying America’s history in a negative light. For instance, a museum exhibit on Cuban immigration conveniently ignores figures like Fidel Castro while placing blame on U.S. actions.
This brings to the forefront an important question: who determines the narrative of American history? In 2020, activists quickly erased history, and in many cases, there was no democratic input involved. Instead, committees formed by the so-called “woke” simply decided what history was worthy of remembrance. A recent poll indicated that only 37% of Democrats believe there is anything to celebrate as the United States approaches its 250th anniversary next year.
The telling viewpoints of academics and cultural leaders have shaped a narrative that often casts America as flawed. Historical interpretations change over time, and the understanding of events such as the Crusades shifts as new perspectives emerge. However, prioritizing a narrative that ignores America’s achievements while highlighting only its transgressions tilts the scale unfairly.
Ultimately, the Trump administration’s approach to reevaluating the Smithsonian exhibits opens the door for a more balanced national debate about history. The processes for these changes are transparent and publicly accessible, contrasting the arbitrary decisions made in the past. It’s imperative that diverse perspectives find representation in our national narrative—especially as we prepare to celebrate this significant milestone in American history.
"*" indicates required fields
