A panel discussion at the People’s Conference for Palestine in Detroit featured a striking declaration from Sachin Peddada, a Ph.D. student and research coordinator at Progressive International. He openly called the United States “an evil country,” urging attendees to “destroy the idea of America in Americans’ heads.” This provocative statement came during a session titled “No Weapons for Genocide: The People Demand an Arms Embargo.”
Peddada, who criticized the U.S. as an “empire” fueled by greed, underscored a profound disconnect he perceives between American citizens and the plight of Palestinians. Citing deceased Palestinian author Bassel al-Araj, he argued, “The average American will never understand the plight of the Palestinian person because the state of Israel is a carbon copy of the United States.” This assertion resonated in the room, prompting applause from the audience.
Throughout his speech, Peddada continued to dismantle notions of American exceptionalism. He declared, “We have to dismantle this idea of American exceptionalism, of supremacy, of being beyond reproach.” He emphasized the importance of criticism as a “healthy process,” suggesting it would help Americans learn from their country’s global actions while pushing boundaries. His intensity increased as he asserted, “We live in an evil country,” attributing significant responsibility for recent violence in Gaza and the West Bank to U.S. foreign policy.
Peddada didn’t shy away from making contentious claims. He stated, “Since October 7, 2023, we can say with certainty that the U.S. has been the most complicit country—complicit is not even the right word—but the most responsible country for what is happening not only in Gaza but also the West Bank and also all over the global south.” His direct words could not be missed: “That doesn’t mean we’re all evil. But it does mean we have a unique responsibility.” His call for solidarity with “siblings in Gaza and in the West Bank” was met with more applause as he linked America’s actions to broader global implications.
Responses to Peddada’s remarks varied sharply. One individual on X expressed outrage, stating, “As an American, I find this galling.” They lamented that their culture had already faced an assault, comparing the current climate to past controversies surrounding the removal of statues of historic figures like Washington and Jefferson. The notion of destroying the idea of America struck a particularly resonant chord of unease among some commentators.
The conference, organized by various pro-Palestinian groups, began on Friday and is set to run through Sunday. Before it even started, it was under scrutiny for featuring speakers with extremist views, including former prisoners released in a Hamas deal and prominent critics of Israel. During the opening ceremony, participants displayed Palestinian flags and led chants, reflecting a charged atmosphere.
Overall, Peddada’s statements point to an escalating narrative among certain groups regarding American identity and foreign policy. The language used at events like this resonates with those who feel disconnected from mainstream American discourse, illustrating the deep divides that characterize current debates surrounding foreign aid and intervention. As discussions here unfold, they capture the fervor of a movement grappling with complex issues that provoke strong emotions on all sides.
"*" indicates required fields
