The political landscape is shifting as some Democrats express a desperate desire for drastic reform. Osita Nwanevu, a contributing editor at The New Republic, argues for a radical restructuring of government in his new book, The Right of the People: Democracy and the Case for a New American Founding. He believes these changes are necessary to give Democrats a better chance of advancing their agenda.
In a recent interview with The New York Times, Nwanevu proposed that the Senate, originally designed to represent all states equally, has become a hindrance for the party. He described it as one of the “most malapportioned upper houses in the world,” pointing out that Wyoming and California receive equal representation despite their vastly different populations. This imbalance, he claims, complicates Democrats’ efforts to secure federal power.
“The Senate shapes the judiciary, it shapes the executive branch, and obviously, it’s a veto point for the passage of even ordinary legislation,” he stated. Nwanevu’s perspective suggests that the Senate’s structural flaws are at odds with democratic principles. He pointedly remarked, “A system is not really democratic, as much as it might purport to be one.”
The urgency for reform is palpable, especially following a substantial election loss for Democrats. Yet rather than engaging with voters, some are contemplating sweeping changes to the political framework. Suggestions include adding new states to the Senate to counterbalance representation, specifically mentioning Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., as potential candidates for statehood.
When asked about the future of the Senate, Nwanevu did not shy away from bold ideas. “I think it’s worth exploring” whether the Senate should even exist, he said. Such remarks underline a growing discontent with the very mechanisms intended to ensure democratic governance.
Beyond the Senate, Nwanevu highlighted the need to reconsider the Electoral College. He noted, “A reform that most Americans have supported for a long time” could involve a national popular vote through an interstate compact. This suggests a willingness among some Democrats to pursue changes that could fundamentally alter the nation’s electoral system.
The push for these reforms reflects a party grappling with its identity and direction. Instead of self-reflection, the focus appears to be on how to reshape the rules of the game. As Nwanevu articulates, this ambition seems to stem less from a commitment to democracy and more from a longing for power, which may ultimately lead to further alienation from the electorate. In their quest for a new political course, they risk losing touch with the very principles that define American democracy.
"*" indicates required fields
