Russian President Vladimir Putin recently remarked that had Donald Trump been in the White House during 2022, Russia would not have invaded Ukraine. This statement came during a summit in Anchorage, Alaska, where both leaders met to discuss the ongoing Ukrainian conflict. Putin’s assertion aligns with Trump’s claims made throughout his 2024 campaign, in which he consistently argued that his presence in office could have prevented the war.
During the summit press conference, Putin recounted his past conversations with Trump, recalling, “I tried to convince my previous American colleague that the situation should not be brought to a point of no return.” He expressed that his warnings during those discussions were “a big mistake” that led to hostilities. Further emphasizing his point, he stated, “Today, when President Trump is saying that if he was the president back then there would be no war — I am quite sure that it would indeed be so. I can confirm that.” This acknowledgment has fueled enthusiasm among Trump supporters, who feel vindicated in their belief that the conflict stemmed from the 2020 election outcomes.
Despite the optimistic tone regarding potential agreements, no deal was finalized at the summit. Trump described the meeting as “a very productive” session and highlighted areas of agreement, though he noted there were significant points still to resolve. “There’s no deal until there’s a deal,” he cautioned, adding that he would reach out to key figures in NATO and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy following the meeting.
In follow-up communications, Trump highlighted the path toward peace. He stated on Truth Social, “It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement.” He underscored the urgency of this discussion, indicating that millions of lives stood to benefit from a successful resolution.
This summit marks a notable attempt at diplomacy amidst a complex geopolitical landscape. As both leaders navigated the intricacies of international relations, the outcome remains uncertain, though direct dialogue continues to play a crucial role in seeking avenues for peace.
"*" indicates required fields