President Donald Trump has taken a firm stance against the Senate’s blue slip tradition, calling it a violation of his constitutional rights to appoint judges and U.S. Attorneys. In a statement posted on social media, Trump expressed his frustration, stating, “My rights have been completely taken away from me in States that have just one Democrat United States Senator.” He argues that this custom effectively grants Democrats the power to veto his nominees.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley defended the blue slip process, indicating that he believes it is an important norm that helps maintain balance and state representation in the nomination process. Grassley stated that the tradition has historical significance and serves as a mechanism for senators to provide input on judicial nominees from their states.
While blue slips are a longstanding tradition in the Senate, they are not codified in law. The Constitution grants the president the authority to nominate candidates, but the Senate has the ultimate say in confirming or rejecting those nominations. Trump’s ongoing discontent with this process is notable; earlier this year, he labeled the blue slip practice a “hoax” and expressed his desire for Grassley to support a quicker path for his nominees, claiming that it creates undue obstacles. “Put simply, the president of the United States will never be permitted to appoint the person of his choice because of an ancient, and probably unconstitutional, ‘CUSTOM,'” he wrote.
In his first term, Trump successfully appointed 234 federal judges, including three Supreme Court justices. However, his current term has seen a stark contrast, with only five judicial confirmations in the first seven months compared to previous years. This decline raises concerns about Trump’s ability to fill judicial vacancies as his administration grapples with the implications of the blue slip policy.
Trump has suggested that his administration might exert pressure on Senate leadership to expedite confirmations, arguing that the only candidates he can get approved are Democrats. He urged Grassley to allow strong Republican nominees to assume key judicial positions and challenged the Democrats: “Tell the Democrats, as they often tell us, to go to HELL!” His comments reflect a determination to reshape the judicial landscape in the coming months despite the existing hurdles.
The situation is further complicated following a ruling by U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann, who found that Alina Habba had served unlawfully as acting U.S. attorney for New Jersey, exceeding the permissible 120-day limit for temporary appointments. This decision is emblematic of the challenges that can arise when navigating the nomination process amid conflicting interpretations of procedure.
Trump’s discontent with the blue slip tradition underscores a broader tension in the Senate regarding the balance of power in judicial appointments. As the weeks progress, the outcomes of Trump’s efforts to push through his nominees will reveal the extent of influence he can wield over the Senate’s confirmation calendar. Ultimately, how this drama unfolds could shape the judicial landscape significantly for years to come.
"*" indicates required fields
