An escalating confrontation between President Donald Trump and the Federal Reserve has taken a new turn with the potential dismissal of Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook. After being accused of engaging in mortgage fraud, Cook insists that Trump’s attempt to terminate her is unjustified. According to a report by The New York Times, Cook claims that the allegations against her do not constitute “cause” for her termination.
On Monday, Trump announced his decision to fire Cook following a criminal referral to the Justice Department from Bill Pulte, the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Pulte claims that Cook fraudulently claimed her Michigan home and an Atlanta condo as her “primary residence.” Such designations typically allow for lower interest rates on loans since homes designated as primary residences generally have a lower likelihood of default. This allegation echoes another referral Pulte has made regarding Democratic Senator Adam Schiff, whom he accused of similar mortgage fraud malfeasance in California and Maryland.
Cook’s response was firm. Through her lawyer, she stated, “No cause exists under the law” for her to be fired. She asserted, “President Trump purported to fire me ‘for cause’ where no cause exists under the law, and he has no authority to do so. I will not resign. I will continue to carry out my duties to help the American economy as I have been doing since 2022.”
In her legal corner is Abbe Lowell, an attorney known for representing Hunter Biden. Echoing the arguments made in defense of Biden, Lowell suggested that the issues at hand are politically motivated. “President Trump has taken to social media to once again ‘fire by tweet’ and once again his reflex to bully is flawed and his demands lack any proper process, basis or legal authority,” Lowell declared. His statement highlights the ongoing tension and political confrontation surrounding Cook’s situation. “We will take whatever actions are needed to prevent his attempted illegal action,” he vowed.
This controversy marks another chapter in the tense relationship between Trump and the Federal Reserve, a feud that reignited with Trump’s return to the White House. Central to this discord has been Trump’s insistence that the Federal Reserve lower interest rates to invigorate the economy. However, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell has resisted those demands. Other disputes, including those over expensive renovations at the Fed’s Washington headquarters, further underscore the complexities of this conflict. Yet the allegations against Cook bring a potential legal dimension to the battle, one that may eventually land in the Supreme Court.
According to a piece from senior political correspondent Jim Geraghty on the conservative platform National Review, the presidential powers over the Federal Reserve are not fully delineated. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 establishes that governors can be removed “for cause by the President,” but it does not specify what “cause” entails. This raises a critical question: Can an unproven allegation of mortgage fraud suffice as grounds for dismissal?
Public reaction has varied. Many on social media seem to believe that Cook’s alleged actions disqualify her from serving at the Fed. One user wrote, “While she repeatedly voted to NOT lower interest rates for us, this Fed Governor was lying on her own mortgage documents to get a lower interest rate for herself.” Another commenter echoed this sentiment, insinuating a double standard for elites: “The ‘elites’ have their own rules.”
On the other side of the aisle, Democrats have voiced strong opposition to Trump’s action. Representative Jasmine Crockett of Texas labeled the move as racist and sexist, emphasizing that Cook is the first black woman to serve as a Fed governor. In her remarks, Crockett stated, “For the first time in 111 years, a President is planning to fire a sitting Fed governor—and of course, it’s the first Black woman, Lisa Cook. Trump’s message is clear: when Black women rise, he’ll do anything to push us down.” She concluded with a forceful declaration that Cook “is not going anywhere.”
This ongoing saga surrounding Lisa Cook and Trump’s attempts to assert control over the Federal Reserve promises to challenge the legal definitions of power within financial governance in the United States. As both sides prepare for what could be a significant showdown, the implications for the economy and the political landscape will continue to unfold.
"*" indicates required fields
