ABC News has come under fire for its handling of the tragic murder of Charlie Kirk, with the network’s portrayal drawing significant backlash. Correspondent Matt Gutman described the text messages exchanged between Tyler Robinson—Kirk’s accused killer—and his transgender partner, Lance Twiggs, as “very touching” and “so loving.” This characterization quickly became a point of contention as it seemed to prioritize the emotional nuance of the murderer’s relationship over the horrific act itself.
The release of these messages by Utah authorities intended to shed light on the murder case, but Gutman’s remarks framed it in a way that many found deeply inappropriate. He suggested that the messages, filled with terms of endearment and expressions of affection, created a “heartbreaking duality.” In his view, they offered an intimate portrait of Robinson’s relationship with Twiggs while utterly failing to address the brutal context of their exchange. The fact that these “romantic” text messages were misapplied in the discussion of a life lost raised eyebrows across the nation.
Characters from the public’s outrage emerged swiftly. Gutman’s references to “intimate” love letters came not long before he delivered chilling details about the murder itself—a public assassination witnessed by children. The juxtaposition of these two narratives—the loving messages and the brutal killing—seemed to suggest that the tragedy of the murder could somehow be softened by the perpetrator’s affectionate words. This framing led many to question the priorities of mainstream media.
“We have seen an alleged murder with such specific text messages about the alleged murder weapon—where it was hidden, how it was placed,” Gutman stated, yet he continued to express a level of sympathy toward the accused. He recounted the misfortune of the murderer and his family, all while glossing over the anguish imposed on Kirk’s loved ones and the distressing reality of what occurred.
The outrage did not stem only from the choice of words. Many felt that rather than condemning an act of politically motivated violence, the focus shifted, painting the alleged murderer in a sympathetic light. Critics noted that the messages between the killer and Twiggs were irrelevant in light of the severity of the crime—a cold-blooded assassination that left a prominent figure dead.
After facing immense public backlash, Matt Gutman issued a tepid apology to clarify his earlier remarks. He claimed he aimed to highlight the stark contrast between the tragedy of the murder and the personal nature of the texts. Yet his apology came too late for many, who found his initial comments failed to reflect the horror of the situation.
In his apology, Gutman stated: “I deeply regret that my words did not make that clear. But let there be zero doubt here: I unequivocally condemn this horrific crime and the pain it caused Charlie Kirk’s family….” The phrase “I deeply regret” echoes the sentiment of those who felt his previous comments missed the mark. This incident illustrates a significant breach in perspective—what should have been a solemn acknowledgment of a violent act transformed into a misguided attempt at empathy.
As discussions around this murder case continue, the focus will likely shift to accountability and the right narrative as it pertains to victims and the tragic events unfolding in the public eye. The fallout from Gutman’s comments serves as a reminder that sensitivity in reporting is paramount, especially when lives have been irrevocably changed by violence.
This case isn’t just about a crime; it exposes a dangerous trend in media where perpetrators are often given a platform for sympathy, leaving victims and their families to grapple with the consequences alone. Society watches closely as it waits for justice and seeks reassurance that narratives will honor those lost rather than rationalize the tragedies they endured.
"*" indicates required fields
