Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett recently provided insights during an interview at Lincoln Center ahead of her forthcoming memoir, “Listening to the Law.” Though she had prepared for protests reminiscent of her colleague Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing, Barrett’s own process unfolded quietly due to COVID-19 precautions, leading her to describe that period as “very awkward.” This candid remark elicited laughter from the audience, setting a more laid-back tone than the typical courtroom atmosphere.
Barrett, at 53, was open about her family life and faith, emphasizing the “indispensable human element to judging.” She highlighted how her colleagues were quick to assist her, sharing office supplies and staff during her early days on the bench. “Thinking in categories of left and right — it’s just the wrong way to think about the law,” Barrett remarked, pushing back against some prevailing perceptions around judicial politics.
While Barrett spoke openly about her experiences, she was noticeably reticent on divisive issues, particularly the so-called “shadow” docket, where emergency applications are quickly decided. This has seen the Supreme Court ruling in favor of the Trump administration on numerous urgent matters, prompting widespread scrutiny of the court’s decisions. When the conversation turned to this contentious topic, Barrett stated, “The Supreme Court is at its best when it can review cases that have been fully adjudicated” and then deftly shifted to more comfortable subjects.
In her discussion, Barrett sought to present the court as operating above the din of political currents. She argued that public expectations often clash with the constitutional and legal principles guiding judicial decisions. Barrett noted, “I think everyone expects the court to deliver the results it likes,” and acknowledged a frequent disconnect between immediate public desires and what the law necessitates. This reflects a broader struggle many justices face: balancing judicial integrity with societal anticipation.
Her responses during the evening hinted at the weight she bears within a polarized judicial landscape. When asked about her opinion in Trump v. CASA, where she made pointed remarks towards Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Barrett framed her words as constructive rather than antagonistic. “I thought Justice Jackson had made an argument in strong terms that I thought warranted a response,” she explained, showcasing her commitment to judicial engagement.
As Barrett prepares for her upcoming public appearances tied to her memoir, her Lincoln Center interview offered more than just anecdotes; it provided a glimpse into the thought process of a justice navigating a politically charged environment. She recalled the moment of her nomination and the weight of the advice from her husband, urging her to “burn the boats.” This phrase, suggesting a once-in-a-lifetime commitment without the option to retreat, resonated deeply with her during the harrowing confirmation timeline that included public criticism, particularly from members of the Senate.
Barrett characterized the current climate as far from a constitutional crisis. “I don’t think that we are currently in a constitutional crisis,” she asserted, underscoring her belief in the endurance of the rule of law. Her conviction reveals a steadfast dedication to the principles of governance even amidst considerable public discontent.
Ultimately, Barrett’s interview painted a picture of a justice who is thoughtful and introspective, one who understands the importance of decorum and duty in a time of turbulence. Her insights did not just reflect her views on the court; they also revealed the personal journey of navigating one of the most influential roles in American governance.
"*" indicates required fields
