After the shocking assassination of Charlie Kirk, a wave of disturbing reactions emerged from left-wing activists on social media. Among these reactions, several were traced back to accounts belonging to U.S. military personnel, leading to outrage from various sectors, including the Department of War. An example of this backlash involved Army Reserves Major Bryan Bintliff, who faced suspension for comments that seemed to glorify Kirk’s death and included threats against President Trump.
In response, Florida’s Governor Ron DeSantis initiated investigations into educators making similar remarks about Kirk’s assassination, underscoring the need for accountability regarding expressions of political violence. The climate of vitriol became further evident with remarks from Master Chief Petty Officer Ben Cooper. He wrote, “If you think that means I condone him getting sniped from 200+ yards away, you’re wrong, but from the crowd that likes to say FAFO so much, how can they be surprised?” Such comments echoed the alarming trend of animosity directed toward Kirk.
Army soldier Drake Richardson added to the toxic discourse, suggesting the world was “a better place” without Kirk. Army Staff Sergeant Jacob Sezer further escalated the conversation, claiming Kirk “deserved worse.” Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell responded firmly, stating, “Mocking or celebrating the assassination of a fellow American is unacceptable in the ranks. Zero tolerance means zero tolerance.” Such statements highlight the Pentagon’s commitment to maintaining decorum within the military.
In conjunction with these military controversies, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy addressed similar behavior from airline pilots. He clarified that pilots caught celebrating Kirk’s assassination would face serious repercussions, stating, “American Airlines pilots who were caught celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk have been immediately grounded and removed from service.” Duffy emphasized, “This behavior is disgusting and they should be fired. Any company responsible for the safety of the traveling public cannot tolerate that behavior.”
The educational sector did not escape criticism either. Following the turmoil, Florida’s education commissioner opted to issue a stern warning to teachers. His statement made it clear: “We will hold teachers who choose to make disgusting comments about the horrific assassination of Charlie Kirk accountable. Govern yourselves accordingly.”
The disturbing trend extended beyond military and aviation professionals. Amanda Dodson, an emotional support teacher from Pennsylvania, reposted a statement laden with hate. She described Kirk as a “racist, xenophobic, transphobic, islamophobic, sexist, white nationalist mouthpiece who made millions of dollars inciting hatred in this country.” Dodson’s contempt for Kirk was explicit when she declared, “I extend absolutely no empathy for people like that.” Her comments culminated in a bleak hope for Kirk’s children: “May they grow up to live in a country that is the total opposite of everything their father envisioned.”
The collective response to Kirk’s murder from various sectors illustrates a growing divide in American society, marked by a proliferation of hate and an alarming trend of glorifying violence in political discourse.
"*" indicates required fields
