A new website, Charlie’s Murderers, has been launched to document reactions to the assassination of Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative voice and advocate for youth activism. Kirk, 31, was shot dead by a sniper while speaking at Utah Valley University, marking a shocking event that has drawn national attention. The website serves as a repository for the disturbing responses from some leftists who took to social media to celebrate his death.
The posts collected on the site come from various professionals, including educators and healthcare workers, sparking outrage among conservatives who see such expressions as reflective of a broader societal problem. Among the standout examples is a video posted by Dr. Tatiana N. Atkins, an anesthesiologist from Florida. In her post, Atkins expressed her satisfaction with Kirk’s death, stating, “I’m just really glad that Charlie Kirk got himself f*cking shot, cause he’s right. Empathy is dangerous to society, so no one should give a fuck that he’s dead.” Her remarks not only show a blatant disregard for Kirk’s life but also raise serious ethical questions about the attitudes of professionals in positions of influence.
Another striking entry is from Amanda Dodson, a teacher in Pennsylvania. She labeled Kirk with a series of harsh epithets, describing him as a “racist, xenophobic, transphobic, islamophobic, sexist, white nationalist mouthpiece.” Her post, which echoed sentiments from a far-left page, showed little empathy for Kirk or his family, illustrating the venomous division within the public discourse. Dodson’s comments, alongside her profile as an educator for vulnerable students, underscore the troubling presence of such ideologies in public schools.
The website reveals a troubling trend, as it catalogs numerous similar instances of vitriol from various public servants. It aims to preserve evidence of these posts, accompanied by screenshots, to hold individuals accountable. The site’s administrator has indicated future functional updates, which will allow users to search for specific entries among the disturbing comments.
As the investigation into Kirk’s assassination continues, the juxtaposition of mourning on one side and celebration on the other amplifies tensions that have been simmering in the current political climate. Many conservatives are left questioning the moral landscape of elected officials and educators who publicly espouse such hatred. The stark contrast between the responses from Kirk’s supporters—who are holding vigils and extending prayers for his family—and the callousness displayed by those on the left highlights a deepening divide.
The growing number of people expressing joy at Kirk’s death, particularly those in influential positions, paints a bleak picture of societal attitudes. While some might dismiss the celebration as fringe behavior, the reality remains that such sentiments are finding a voice, and that cannot be ignored. The manhunt for Kirk’s assassin is ongoing, yet the broader implications of this tragedy are just beginning to surface, prompting serious discussions about the values held by those in power and the societal consequences of unchecked vitriol.
"*" indicates required fields
