Claims that China has moved beyond communism often ignore crucial facts. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) still holds an unassailable grip on the country. This is not merely a matter of nomenclature; it’s about the governance structure that remains firmly rooted in communist ideology. The existence of eight minor parties does not alter this reality, as these parties must submit to the CCP’s dominion. At its core, China’s political framework remains 100% communist.
Economically, the narrative of China’s shift to a capitalist system fails to hold up under scrutiny. The overwhelming majority of companies are under state control. Critics often cite only state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in their discussions, neglecting the extensive web of state influence that stretches across the vast majority of the corporate sector. China has around 40 million registered firms, yet merely 391,000 are fully state-owned. However, including companies with even partial state stakes radically alters the picture. In fact, nearly 867,000 firms have some form of state ownership.
In 2017, companies with state stakes represented roughly 68% of the economy’s capital. Scholars tracking these connections have identified hundreds of thousands of firms closely linked to SOEs. The extent of state ownership extends far beyond what many analyses reveal, encompassing over 3.5 million firms indirectly connected to the state through various ownership structures.
The state’s encroachment into the economy has been growing. From 2000 to 2019, the number of private individuals directly tied to the state tripled. By 2022, 71% of companies on the Fortune 500 list were state-owned, and by 2021, more than half of China’s largest firms fell under state control. This trend underscores the CCP’s increasing involvement in the economy, directly contrasting with narratives that downplay this influence.
Misunderstandings stemming from reliance on China’s Annual Industry Survey (AIS) contribute to this downplaying. The AIS uses categories that can be inconsistent, alongside self-reported ownership data that gives firms incentives to obscure their connections to the state. When a more thorough analysis is undertaken, it becomes clear: the CCP’s influence pervades, with over half of all companies falling under some form of its control.
Control extends not only to firms but also to the stock market in China. Managed by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC), this agency enforces state directives—which is a stark contrast to the independent regulation seen in other nations. The CSRC was recently elevated in status, reinforcing its role as a vehicle for state management of the stock market. This interventionism is echoed in recent events where the CSRC directed institutional investors to halt stock sales in efforts to stabilize share prices—a clear sign of market manipulation by the government.
The CCP’s interventionist approach challenges the notion of a market economy. It’s evident that China’s model is not driven by market forces but by government command. The so-called “socialist market economy,” which was introduced by Jiang Zemin, serves more as a descriptor of state capitalism rather than a genuine market economy. The party’s commitment to state ownership is unwavering, as Xi Jinping has asserted that the state’s dominant economic role is non-negotiable.
This dominance is enforced through the CCP’s direct control over economic mechanisms, regulatory agencies, and land ownership—all vital components of the economy. The party ensures that it retains both political and economic oversight over significant sectors. As the facts illustrate, the idea of China transforming into a capitalist system is not only misleading; it obscures the continued strength and influence of the CCP in every facet of life.
"*" indicates required fields
