China’s much-lauded economic rise appears to be built on a shaky foundation when scrutinized closely. Advocates of the Communist Party often tout the dramatic claim that the regime has “lifted 800 million people out of poverty.” However, this narrative conveniently overlooks a stark truth: it was the Communist Party that initially thrust around 700 million people into poverty. Only through a limited embrace of capitalism did these individuals begin to improve their circumstances.
Numbers can serve both the light and shadows of an argument. For instance, since 2000, average income in China has reportedly surged by about 700 percent, in contrast to the United States’ mere 92 percent growth in the same period. Yet, this statistic is deceptively selective. The American starting point in 1900 was approximately $450, while in China, it was a mere $15. Fast forward to 2000, and the U.S. figure had risen to $41,989 versus only $959 in China. Today, average American income rests at about $80,610, while China lags behind at just $13,300. This stark disparity underscores the complexity of comparing economic growth directly.
Furthermore, claims regarding China’s middle class are riddled with misleading definitions. Estimates suggest China boasts a middle class of around 500 million—greater than the U.S. population. However, this figure is rooted in a broad definition that allows anyone earning as little as $7,250 a year to be classified as “middle class.” In contrast, the U.S. sees an average annual disposable income of about $52,000, or $4,333 monthly. Numbers from China’s National Development and Reform Commission reveal a sobering reality: 900 million Chinese citizens live on less than $282 a month, while 600 million scrape by on under $143.
The disparities do not end there. In the United States, public assistance programs like SNAP require a single-person household to earn $2,510 or less per month to qualify for benefits. The average benefit for fiscal year 2025 is projected to be $187 per month, eclipsing the total disposable income for many Chinese households. Education and health care further illustrate the burden faced by citizens in China. While K–12 education is free in the U.S., public schooling in China, though “compulsory,” comes with significant fees, ranging from $600 to $2,200 a year. Families typically spend about $1,200 annually on education, which constitutes 17 percent of their total income. The weight falls heaviest on poorer families, who spend a staggering 56.8 percent of their income on their children’s schooling.
Retirement benefits offer another stark contrast. U.S. retirees enjoy an average monthly Social Security benefit expected to be $1,976 by January 2025, in addition to income from pensions and investments. The average retirement income for Americans aged 65 and over reaches about $83,950. Conversely, in China, urban workers on average receive a monthly pension of merely $461, while rural pensioners make do with as little as $14 to $28 each month.
Healthcare provides another critical area where expectations diverge significantly between the two nations. Though China claims to provide universal healthcare, patients often face out-of-pocket expenses that represent a significant portion of their income. With public health insurance covering just about half of medical costs, many citizens turn to private hospitals, which have grown rapidly over the past decade. There are now two private hospitals for every public one, with the private sector generating around $90 billion annually.
Ultimately, when examining the realities of daily life and economic stability, the average Chinese citizen faces considerably greater hardships than their American counterparts. An average American enjoys disposable income that can be up to 30 times greater than that of a typical Chinese citizen. In light of these facts, the narrative surrounding China’s supposed economic miracle appears far less compelling than it is often portrayed. The harsh truths about poverty, income disparity, and social safety nets highlight a system grappling with its own limitations, revealing that economic progress comes with significant caveats and compromises.
"*" indicates required fields
