On Sunday, CNN’s “State of the Union” provided a revealing moment in the ongoing struggle over the network’s credibility. Sebastian Gorka, a conservative commentator and former aide in the Trump administration, squared off against CNN’s Brianna Keilar. The topic was sensitive: the involvement of transgender individuals in mass shootings, a discussion sparked by a tragic incident involving a 23-year-old man identifying as a woman who committed horrific acts at a Catholic school in Minneapolis.
The clash between Gorka and Keilar quickly exposed the problem at CNN. Gorka asserted that the rise of violent incidents related to transgender individuals is alarming, directly countering Keilar’s attempt to downplay this connection. “Forgive me if I don’t go with CNN stats. Okay?” Gorka stated, pulling no punches in his critique. He highlighted the ideological motivations behind mass shootings, emphasizing that the recent attacks were not mere acts of random violence but rather deeply rooted in a troubling narrative.
Gorka argued that the statistics Keilar used did not accurately reflect the reality of these cases. Keilar had claimed that “96 percent” of mass attacks involved “non-trans men.” While this figure might initially seem solid, Gorka pointed out that it encompassed a broad spectrum of crime, much of which is linked to gang violence or drug deals. He quickly connected the dots between the attackers’ personal letters and their stated motivations, identifying an underlying hatred fueled by ideology.
“There was an ideological content to this attack. That’s what terrorism is,” Gorka stated, summarizing the deadly message behind these actions. He differentiated the recent tragedies from typical gang-related violence, stressing, “It is an ideological message, whether it was anti-Israel…or whether we saw the fact that it was anti-Christian and targeting children.” His argument highlighted a pattern that left much of the liberal media floundering under the weight of facts they preferred to ignore.
When Keilar challenged Gorka on specific numbers—questioning whether it was seven or five transgender individuals involved in mass shootings—her rebuttal fell flat. To many viewers, it appeared she was grasping at straws rather than engaging with the weight of Gorka’s argument. The uncomfortable reality is that the narrative many in the media wish to promote falters when confronted with facts that don’t align with their preferred storylines.
As Gorka laid out his points with a clarity that cut through the clutter, viewer reactions on social media underscored the frustration many feel toward mainstream media. Comments like, “Well done. Well said. It’s past time to push back on the mainstream media,” and “Why does CNN always do things like this to promote agendas?” reflected a growing discontent among audiences who are tired of being fed a sanitized version of the news.
CNN’s dwindling viewer numbers paint a grim picture of the network’s current state. According to recent ratings from AdWeek, CNN’s audience was shockingly smaller than that of its competitors. Fox News outperformed CNN by a massive margin, with Fox drawing nearly five times the viewers. In the second quarter of 2025, CNN’s performance was so poor that it mustered fewer viewers than many other cable networks, indicating a troubling trend for the future of CNN.
Year after year, CNN’s relentless criticism of political figures has cost it credibility. The aftermath of the Trump administration has seen its ratings plunge, leaving it struggling against a backdrop of competitor success. With audiences seeking more balanced and honest reporting, CNN appears increasingly out of touch. The lack of engagement with the realities of the issues discussed on air, as demonstrated during Gorka’s exchange with Keilar, signals that the network may need to reevaluate its approach if it hopes to regain its footing.
For Gorka, his performance against Keilar wasn’t just a debate; it was a showcase of what happens when facts are put front and center against narratives designed to distract. Here was a moment where conservative perspectives found a platform, albeit on a network still grappling with its identity in the current media landscape. Watching Gorka dismantle Keilar’s arguments provided clear insights into how the ideological battles of our time are being framed—and often misrepresented—by the media.
The implications of this exchange reverberate beyond the immediate discussion of mass violence and transgender issues. They suggest a broader conversation about truth in journalism, audience engagement, and the power of straightforward dialogue. Gorka’s assertiveness on CNN may very well signal a turning point in how these critical issues are debated in the public arena. As viewers navigate the news landscape, the demand for accuracy and accountability remains paramount.
In conclusion, the incident between Gorka and Keilar illustrates the perilous path CNN is on as it attempts to regain its audience and credibility. While the clash may have entertained a handful of viewers, it also showcased a deeper need for honesty in reporting—a need that many feel is currently absent in mainstream news outlets.
"*" indicates required fields
