MSNBC legal analyst Danny Cevallos has expressed skepticism regarding former FBI Director James Comey’s chances of having his case dismissed through a pretrial motion. Comey was indicted by the Department of Justice (DOJ) for making false statements to Congress and obstructing a congressional investigation. This followed his testimony during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in September 2020. On the program “Ana Cabrera Reports,” Cevallos detailed the difficulties that Comey may face in court, particularly concerning defenses based on “selective prosecution” or “pretrial publicity,” especially linked to former President Donald Trump’s involvement.
Cevallos remarked, “The problem with these motions is that they have a 0 to 1 percent chance of succeeding.” Even though he acknowledged that the elements for a claim of selective prosecution exist in this case, he remained realistic about the legal landscape. “The reality is, virtually all federal prosecution is selective by nature,” he explained. He pointed out that due to the limited jurisdiction of the federal government, it cannot prosecute every federal crime. This selectivity, he argued, is a fundamental aspect of being a federal prosecutor.
He emphasized that motions to dismiss based on these arguments often fail. “Judges do not like to deny prosecutors their opportunity to try the case,” Cevallos noted. His insight suggests that despite Comey’s desire to eliminate the case before it reaches trial, the likelihood of success remains low.
Comey maintains his innocence in light of the indictment, which contradicts his assertion that he did not authorize an anonymous source at the FBI. On Instagram, he stated, “My heart is broken for the Department of Justice, but I have great confidence in the federal judicial system, and I’m innocent. So let’s have a trial and keep the faith.” This declaration illustrates his determination to address the charges through the judicial process.
Former President Trump, reflecting on Comey’s situation, has expressed a stark view regarding the potential legal repercussions for Comey and others involved, including former CIA Director John Brennan. In an interview with the Daily Caller, Trump mentioned it “would not bother” him to see Comey arrested live on television. Trump’s comments also revealed frustration with the current state of investigations into Comey and other political figures, including Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James.
The legal scrutiny surrounding Comey is compounded by allegations stemming from a CIA memo released earlier this year. This memo raises questions about the veracity of Comey’s and Brennan’s 2017 testimonies, particularly their claims that the infamous Steele Dossier did not influence the Intelligence Community Assessment.
As the case develops, it remains to be seen how it will unfold in court and what implications it may have for the individuals involved. Cevallos’s analysis highlights a broader understanding of the complexities within federal prosecutions, especially when high-profile figures are involved.
"*" indicates required fields
