Stand-up comedian Darius Dinkins has stirred significant controversy with his repugnant remarks following the assassination of conservative figure Charlie Kirk. In a video shared on Instagram, Dinkins openly mocked Kirk’s death, branding him as “a demon.” His tone and choice of words reveal a disturbing trend among certain individuals on the far-left who seem to celebrate political violence rather than condemn it.
Dinkins did not mince words. He expressed his lack of remorse for Kirk’s assassination by stating he was “glad it happened” and claimed to feel “giddy” upon hearing the news. His chilling comments reflect an alarming level of moral decay. “I can’t find it in my spirit to pretend,” he admitted, indicating a complete rejection of any pretense of pity or empathy typically expected in the wake of tragedy, regardless of political differences.
Further, Dinkins attempted to justify his feelings by describing Kirk’s life and past actions. He referred to Kirk’s statements on serious issues such as mass shootings and reproductive rights. Dinkins pointedly mentioned Kirk’s stance regarding forcing his daughter to bear a child from an assault, labeling the conservative as hypocritical for expressing concern for his own family while disregarding the lives of others affected by violence. “Every single victim of the mass shootings that he’s repeatedly defended,” he said, suggesting that Kirk’s views on these tragedies somehow erased his humanity.
The comedian’s remarks about “white on white crime” and a so-called “karmically deserved outcome” for Kirk further underscore the growing hostility among some who consider political differences as justifications for violence. Dinkins’ repeated emphasis on Kirk’s alleged evil only serves to normalize a perception where certain individuals are deemed unworthy of empathy or respect.
In proclaiming that it is “laughable” to maintain civility in today’s political climate, Dinkins encapsulates a growing trend of dismissing decorum in discourse. His rhetoric insists that emotional responses to violence should stem from ideology rather than basic human decency. By rejecting the notion that respect should extend to all individuals, regardless of their beliefs, he highlights a divisive and troubling narrative within certain circles.
The broader implications of Dinkins’ comments extend beyond one individual’s stance. They signal a shrinking space for genuine discourse that allows for dissenting opinions without a script of hatred. In portraying Kirk as a figure deserving of derision and celebrating his assassination, Dinkins illustrates how the erosion of civility can lead to greater societal rifts.
In reflection, Dinkins’ behavior serves as a mirror reflecting a troubling aspect of contemporary political engagement. The mockery of violence against those with opposing views showcases a lack of compassion that can have real-world repercussions. As this episode resonates across media outlets and social platforms, it forces society to confront the consequences of such incendiary rhetoric and the potential for dangerously unchecked expressions of hatred.
"*" indicates required fields
