Democrats and their allies in the media continue to display disturbing behavior following the tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk 16 days ago. Rather than expressing remorse or reflection, they seem to revel in their moral complicity. Their latest tactic appears to be playing the victim while diverting attention from the violent act committed against Kirk, an influential figure in conservative circles.
Take the recent segment on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” Co-host Joe Scarborough labeled former FBI Director James Comey a “martyr for the rule of law.” In doing so, he gave liberals an unexpected hero to rally around, right after the news of Comey’s indictment on two serious charges: making false statements and obstruction. This characterization of Comey as a martyr is not only questionable but also alarming, especially when Scarborough suggests that President Donald Trump’s criticism of Comey led to the indictment decision. “You do this,” Scarborough claimed, referring to the indictment decision, “you turn the person you hate into a martyr.”
By invoking the word “martyr” repeatedly—five times in under a minute—Scarborough seeks to frame Comey’s predicament in a way that distracts from the weight of the impending legal issues. It serves to shift focus from the reality of Kirk’s murder, an incident that highlights violent political extremism.
Scarborough continued his diatribe, insisting that Comey now occupies the role of a “political and a legal martyr.” His remarks seem aimed at cementing Comey’s status in the eyes of their audience, while conveniently glossing over the seriousness of the charges against him. Perhaps the most striking aspect of this narrative is how Scarborough attempts to elevate Comey amidst the backdrop of Kirk’s assassination, which provokes a sense of dissonance and moral bankruptcy. As the world grapples with Kirk’s tragic death, it’s troubling to see an effort to elevate a disgraced figure instead.
Social media users have been quick to criticize this perceived attempt at martyrdom. Comments on platforms like X reflect a growing discontent. One user remarked on the irony of Scarborough’s comments, noting, “Comey isn’t a martyr. Charlie Kirk is a martyr.” Another chimed in, drawing attention to the hypocrisy: “Interesting that they are using the word martyr so soon after Charlie Kirk’s martyrdom.” These responses underscore a significant disconnect between how the left attempts to frame their narratives and the reality perceived by many across the political spectrum.
In the aftermath of Kirk’s assassination, liberal responses have, at times, appeared gleeful and malign, overshadowing the serious implications of political violence. This creates a bleak tapestry in which language becomes a weapon. By co-opting the term “martyr,” they further demonstrate their eagerness to manipulate narratives to their advantage, seemingly indifferent to the gravity of real victims.
In summary, the left’s response to Charlie Kirk’s murder reveals a troubling disposition toward political exploitation. By framing figures like Comey as martyrs, they shift focus from pressing issues of violence and moral decay in today’s political atmosphere. As debates rage on, a question lingers: Can we expect honesty and integrity from those who seem adept at twisting narratives to suit their own ends? In the words of a social media user, the continued use of the term “martyr” under these circumstances feels like a low blow to the sanctity of life and the reality of political violence.
"*" indicates required fields
