A lively exchange unfolded on Fox News Channel’s “The Five,” showcasing the friction between co-host Jessica Tarlov and Greg Gutfeld regarding President Trump’s approach to crime in urban areas. Tarlov did not mince words, labeling Gutfeld and his conservative counterparts as “hypocrites” for allegedly taking issue with actions they would otherwise decry if a Democrat were in office.
The situation kicked off when Tarlov asserted that Gutfeld would express outrage if Obama or Biden had enacted similar policies to Trump’s. She specifically highlighted Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., as part of a strategy to combat urban crime and hinted that such actions would create a firestorm of criticism if they came from a Democratic leader. “Let’s say that a Democrat was…” she began, only to be interrupted by Gutfeld, who dismissed her concerns, saying he supports the deployment and isn’t bothered by it.
As the tension escalated, Tarlov pressed further, arguing, “Then you’re a bad constitutionalist,” suggesting that Gutfeld’s support for Trump’s moves indicated a failure to uphold constitutional principles. She leaned heavily into her point by asserting that Trump was effectively “shaking down Intel,” attributing nefarious motives to the President’s actions. “Let’s say that a Democrat was deploying the National Guard to cities controlled by Republicans,” she challenged, visualizing a scenario in which such actions would spark backlash.
Gutfeld, unfazed, reiterated his stance. “I support those moves, so I don’t care,” he stated, a phrase that seemed to fuel Tarlov’s ire. She subsequently painted a vivid picture, invoking a hypothetical situation where a Democratic president would want to control museum content or campus life. “I might add, let’s say a Democratic president said, ‘I would like to control what goes in our museums,’” she asserted, striving to illustrate the dangers she perceives in Trump’s methods.
Gutfeld, not letting the opportunity slip, joked about Tarlov’s narrative, likening it to describing a “dystopian universe.” This prompted Tarlov’s frustration to boil over. “But you know that if a Democratic president was doing any of these things, you would be irate!” she exclaimed, insisting that Gutfeld’s reaction would be starkly different if the tables were turned.
As Gutfeld quipped about her ability to “read his mind,” he kept insisting, “You can’t read my mind.” Tarlov, confident in her understanding of his thought process, responded, “I know you well enough.” This exchange underscored the perpetual conflict on the panel, with Tarlov striving to penetrate Gutfeld’s seemingly steadfast defenses.
In a twist, Gutfeld injected a personal jab, calling her a “typical chick,” suggesting she was putting words in his mouth based on her assumptions. This comment sent Tarlov over the edge. “Oh, you have now absolutely gone too far,” she shot back, visibly incensed. Gutfeld, reveling in the moment, responded with laughter, inflaming the situation further, saying, “But you’re a real chick, okay.”
The interaction exemplified the heated dynamic prevalent on “The Five,” where strong personalities clash over the nation’s political landscape. Tarlov’s assertions, juxtaposed with Gutfeld’s unwavering support of Trump, revealed deep partisanship intricately woven into their discussions. As the segment wrapped, it became clear that this spirited debate would resonate with viewers, evoking a range of reactions from approval to outrage.
Ultimately, the debate highlighted the ongoing tension and the contrasting worldviews that often arise when discussing President Trump’s actions. With emotions running high and each co-host conveying their distinct perspectives, “The Five” continues to serve as a microcosm for the broader political landscape.
"*" indicates required fields
