The recent piece titled “The Grassy Knoll” at Utah Valley University, authored by Martel Maxim, draws a striking parallel between historical assassination narratives and contemporary events, particularly the assassination attempt on Charlie Kirk. Maxim asserts that the Deep State’s strategies have remained consistent over the decades, echoing tactics used since the days of JFK. He lays them out in seven clear steps, which serve as a formula for understanding these manipulated events.
Step one involves the identification of a target, someone who poses a potential threat to established interests. In the case of JFK, powerful factions that wanted to maintain the status quo, particularly related to Vietnam, lined up against him. Similarly, Kirk, as a prominent voice against what he describes as the destructive influence of woke ideology, became a target for those who perceive him as a threat. Maxim argues, “He represented a potential future we can only imagine.”
Next, there’s the successful execution of the assassination attempt. Maxim posits that the Deep State is often efficient in its objectives, suggesting that Kirk’s elimination was a calculated move to neutralize an emerging political power. After that, Maxim outlines the deployment of a cover story, which he claims rarely withstands scrutiny from those employing common sense. History shows a pattern where the narrative surrounding such events is often designed to obfuscate the truth.
According to Maxim, the Deep State is equipped with prepared rebuttals for anyone questioning their official narrative. This mirrors public responses in the aftermath of Kirk’s assassination attempt, which include dismissive terms aimed at detractors. A historical analogy is the “lone gunman” concept perpetuated after JFK’s assassination, serving to illustrate this phenomenon. These collective defensive measures against scrutiny often include name-calling, as evidenced by the way the media has treated opponents of prevailing narratives.
Furthering this analysis, Maxim emphasizes that despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, the powers that be remain steadfast in their refusal to adjust their narratives. Take the case of Tina Peters, another target of this systemic manipulation. Peters uncovered significant irregularities surrounding election integrity, and as Maxim details, the authorities conjured false charges against her, stripping her of basic legal rights. This misapplication of power represents step six in Maxim’s framework, whereby the common sense of the populace is disregarded. A judge’s dismissal of her evidence as “junk science” exemplifies this blind adherence to the narrative.
Finally, as history tends to repeat its patterns, Maxim warns that stories like that of Charlie Kirk are at risk of being relegated to mere footnotes. Without significant change in the structures of power that uphold these deceptions, the narrative will persist unchallenged.
In summary, Martel Maxim’s analysis offers a structured lens through which to view the latest events against the backdrop of historical precedents. The repetition of these steps highlights a troubling continuity in the ways institutions operate to maintain control over information and public perception. As citizens grapple with these ongoing crises, understanding the systematic approach to manipulating narratives is crucial for discerning the truth beneath the surface of everyday headlines.
"*" indicates required fields
