In an eye-opening interview, former AfD MP Dr. Heinrich Ekkehard Fiechtner sheds light on the growing authoritarianism within Germany. He describes how the ruling powers are targeting dissenters, particularly those who question the actions taken during the COVID-19 pandemic. Fiechtner, a seasoned oncologist, faces severe repercussions for his opposition to the government’s stringent measures, including the threat of losing his medical license and prison time.
Fiechtner asserts that speaking out against the government has become increasingly dangerous. “People understandably don’t want to repeat that dark chapter” of Germany’s past, he notes, but this fear has created a climate where criticism is stifled. He draws a stark comparison to the old East German regime, pointing out that the German people’s current experience echoes the oppression of that era.
In recent years, dissenters have faced legal action regularly. One troubling case involves Dr. Heinrich Habig, who was sentenced to prison for issuing COVID-19 vaccination certificates without actually administering vaccines. Fiechtner believes such actions reflect a regime that has grown tyrannical, stating, “It acts more like a tyranny, sending a warning to other countries of what can happen when power goes unchecked.” This reality starkly highlights the government’s commitment to maintaining control through oppressive legal measures.
Fiechtner’s own encounters with the law illustrate the absurdity of the judicial responses to dissent. He recalls being persecuted for satirical gestures meant to criticize the government. “It was clearly satire, clearly criticism,” he insists, yet the courts twisted his words to frame him as a promoter of tyranny. This pattern of selective legal enforcement favors those aligned with the regime while punishing critics. As he explains, “It’s not really about the gesture itself; it’s about silencing anyone who challenges the system.”
He also recalls how his perspective evolved during the early days of the pandemic. Initially, like many, he accepted the necessity of masks. However, his curiosity was piqued after viewing critical analyses questioning their efficacy. “I began to question the severity of the virus itself,” he notes, referencing the lower lethality rate revealed in research he reviewed. By early 2020, he had pivoted to view the government’s measures as an infringement on civil liberties rather than a public health necessity.
Throughout the pandemic, Fiechtner provided care for COVID-19 patients, keeping his practice open when many others shut down. He treated patients without discrimination, indicating that he turned away only those who confirmed they had tested positive for the virus—not from fear, but to protect his practice from potential government scrutiny. “I wanted to keep people out of the hospital whenever I could,” he explains, further illustrating his commitment to providing care.
His observations on the vaccines, fueled by skepticism about their rushed development and potential side effects, reflect a broader concern echoed by many practitioners. He critiques the blurred definitions of vaccines, pointing out that the COVID-19 vaccines use genetic technology, raising unaddressed questions about their long-term safety. “This misrepresentation is concerning,” Fiechtner states, emphasizing the need for transparency in the discussion surrounding vaccination.
Furthermore, Fiechtner has noticed alarming trends among vaccinated patients. He recounts instances of accelerated cancer progression and issues with vascular health, including difficulty accessing veins for treatment. While acknowledging the anecdotal nature of his claims, he underscores his long career in oncology and the unfamiliar patterns he has observed since the vaccine rollout. “I’ve never seen anything like this,” he declares, emphasizing the weight of his experience in healthcare.
As Fiechtner reflects on his experiences, he emphasizes the importance of vigilance in protecting free expression and individual rights. His story serves as a stark reminder of the ramifications of government overreach and the chilling effects it can have on both medical professionals and the general public.
In conclusion, Dr. Fiechtner’s experiences illustrate a broader struggle against authoritarian tendencies in Germany. His commitment to truth-telling, despite severe personal risk, speaks volumes about the current state of intellectual freedom and the importance of defending it.
"*" indicates required fields
