The House of Representatives passed its version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) on Wednesday evening…yet the vote was characterized by deep partisan divides. For years, this annual bill has garnered bipartisan support, a tradition that now seems to be eroding. The fiscal year 2026 version passed with a vote of 231-196, reflecting a striking split: 17 Democrats voted for it while 192 opposed it.
Key figures in Congress voiced strong opinions about the bill. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and other Democrats remained opposed, decrying amendments introduced by Republican lawmakers, particularly those concerning transgender issues. A significant number of these amendments gained traction during the voting process. For instance, amendments by Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina, which limited access for transgender service academy cadets to certain spaces, were passed largely along party lines. Additionally, Rep. Jimmy Patronis from Florida succeeded in pushing through an amendment that sought to eliminate the Department of Defense’s preference for electric or hybrid vehicles.
The division in the House was palpable, especially regarding symbolic amendments. Rep. Cory Mills from Florida introduced a measure to prohibit pride flags and other ideological symbols from being displayed on military installations. This amendment also passed with mainly Republican support, further intensifying the partisan atmosphere.
On the Democratic side, Rep. Adam Smith, the leading Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, issued a stark warning. He stated that if the bill included certain Republican-led amendments, he would change his vote against final passage. “There are a number of problematic amendments included in the rule that focus on divisive topics rather than strengthening our national security,” he remarked. Smith emphasized the long-standing tradition of Congress prioritizing national security over political disputes, a tradition he believes this bill undermines.
Rep. Sara Jacobs from California similarly condemned the amendments linked to transgender issues. In her remarks, she highlighted the personal connection many lawmakers have had with gender-affirming care, referring to various forms: “Filler is gender-affirming care. Boob jobs is gender-affirming care. Botox is gender-affirming care,” she said. Her comments sparked a heated reaction from Rep. Mace, who dismissed Jacobs’ statements as “absolutely ridiculous.”
Notably, four Republicans joined the Democrats in opposing the bill, including well-known figures like Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massie, who have historically voiced skepticism about foreign aid funding included in the NDAA. Conversely, some Democrats crossed party lines to support the bill, such as Reps. Jared Golden of Maine and Henry Cuellar of Texas, reflecting complex loyalties within the party.
The NDAA serves as a pivotal piece of legislation that outlines defense and national security priorities for the United States. As the Senate prepares to debate its version of the bill, a bipartisan compromise will be necessary before it reaches the President’s desk. This ongoing negotiation represents not just differing views on military policy but a broader struggle over cultural and ideological divides that seem to be permeating the legislative process.
"*" indicates required fields
