A Republican lawmaker has raised concerns about the content aired on a high school TV program in Iowa during “Bisexual Plus Awareness Week.” Rep. Ashley Hinson expressed her outrage via social media, describing the segment as “so bad and inappropriate” that she would not share it with her followers. Her statement as both a mother and a legislator highlights an escalating tension between educational content and parental rights regarding the information presented to students.
“I am so appalled that the school is promoting sexual content to minors,” Hinson stated, questioning the decisions made by school administrators. She specifically asked why parents were not informed about the explicit nature of the content their children were subjected to. Hinson is calling for an investigation through the Department of Education, expressing a commitment to holding those responsible accountable.
The segment in question aired on September 25 and featured a student from the school’s Gay-Straight Alliance (GSA) club named Spectrum. The student explained that “Spectrum is close to wrapping up our celebration of Bisexual Plus Awareness Week” and defined the term “plus” to include a spectrum of sexual identities beyond just homosexual and heterosexual. This definition covers various identities, including bisexual, pansexual, fluid, queer, and omnisexual, emphasizing that attraction can be complex.
While Hinson is demanding accountability from the school district, the Linn-Mar Community School District has confirmed its awareness of the segment and is currently investigating whether any policies were violated. Their commitment to an “inclusive environment” is clear, yet Hinson believes that parental rights were overlooked in the process of informing students about these topics.
In a letter to Education Secretary Linda McMahon, Hinson expressed her discontent, stating that the school broadcasted encouraging messages on sexual identity without parental consent. “Our schools should be educating students, not indoctrinating them,” she declared, underlining her view that it is inappropriate for schools to take on roles in teaching sexual identity.
Hinson’s argument rests on a significant concern: the exclusion of parents from discussions about sensitive topics. She emphasized that similar segments had aired prior to the September 25 broadcast, further complicating the issue. Her insistence on parental involvement in educational content reveals a growing frustration among many parents who feel sidelined in their children’s education.
As she called for a full investigation, Hinson showed determination to challenge the school’s approach to discussing sexual identity. She urged that parents should be the ones to decide what information and values are communicated to their children. This reflects a broader sentiment shared by many concerned parents about the education system’s influence on youth.
McMahon’s Department of Education has yet to respond specifically to the allegations raised by Hinson. However, underlying these events is a larger narrative pushed during the Trump administration, which emphasized parental rights and challenged perceived indoctrination in schools. In fact, Trump’s executive order titled “Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling” speaks to a movement among conservative lawmakers advocating for greater oversight and control over educational content.
This incident at Linn-Mar High School illustrates the ongoing cultural battle over the kind of education children receive. Hinson’s response and demands for action may resonate with other parents who share similar concerns about the influence of school curricula on children’s beliefs and values. Hinson’s fervent call for transparency puts a spotlight on the debate surrounding parental rights in education, suggesting that more scrutiny may be on the horizon as this issue develops.
"*" indicates required fields
