“Remember, remember the fifth of November.” This famous phrase recalls the failed Gunpowder Plot of 1605 but also resonates amid current political discussions surrounding the events of January 6, 2021. Recent remarks by Democratic Representatives Eric Swalwell and Jasmine Crockett at a news conference reveal a commitment to the narrative many in their party continue to promote regarding that day.
During a clip shared on social media, Swalwell posed an engaging yet misleading question: “Since the Civil War, what are the three most important dates in American history?” After a theatrical pause, he declared his answers: “December 7, 1941,” and “September 11.” He associated January 6 with these two pivotal moments in American history, attempting to elevate a chaotic day to the status of monumental tragedies. Swalwell’s assertion implies that the events of January 6 possess unprecedented significance, an argument that many find exaggerated. In his view, these dates are “seared into our memories,” yet this insistence merits scrutiny.
Crockett also escalated the rhetoric, asserting during the same conference, “On that day, there was an attempt to tear apart our democracy brick by brick.” Such statements echo the language used by many Democrats in discussions about January 6, framing the incursion as an existential threat to the democratic process. It’s a dramatic depiction, yet many view it as detached from the reality of the events and the motivations behind them.
Furthermore, Crockett made an unsubstantiated claim regarding former President Trump, saying, “On January 6, Donald Trump not only incited the attack, he doubled down by pardoning those violent insurrectionists.” This assertion has been a focal point of the Democratic narrative, often criticized for lacking firm evidence and presenting a simplified view of complex legal and political issues.
Meanwhile, the political climate surrounding the formation of a new January 6 subcommittee reveals deeper implications. Rep. Barry Loudermilk, a Republican from Georgia, is set to chair this committee established by House Speaker Mike Johnson. Unlike previous iterations populated predominantly by Democrats, this committee could reflect a broader array of voices in political discourse. Yet even with a Republican leading the effort, Swalwell and Crockett seem poised to serve as vocal proponents of the traditional Democratic stance, suggesting a potential friction within the committee.
Despite the fervent claims from Democratic representatives, the narrative surrounding January 6 appears to be losing credibility. The 2024 election results, particularly Trump’s return as a viable candidate, signal that many voters are not bought into the extreme representations of that day. A considerable segment of the American populace demonstrated skepticism towards the focus and implications of the January 6 narrative when they re-elected Trump. This electoral outcome diminishes the weight of the Democrats’ narrative, regardless of the fervor with which they present it.
As Democrats continue to promote their version of events, they may be reminded of history’s lessons — particularly the line, “Remember, remember the fifth of November.” As time passes and loyalties shift, the persistence of narratives in political discourse can shift dramatically, often revealing more about their proponents than about the events themselves. As such, while the spectacle may roll on, the question remains: how many are truly persuaded by the arguments articulated in this current moment of political drama?
"*" indicates required fields
