Vice President Kamala Harris has brought to light a fascinating behind-the-scenes look at the dynamics of the Biden campaign, particularly regarding Biden’s performance during a pivotal debate against Donald Trump. In her memoir, “107 Days,” Harris recounts how she was pressured to cheerlead for Biden, despite his glaring shortcomings on stage. Referencing a set of talking points her team provided, she bluntly remarked, “No. Don’t feed me bulls–t. Everyone saw what they saw.” This honest admission reveals the tension between maintaining party unity and acknowledging the truth of a disappointing display.
Harris was visibly frustrated by Biden’s performance, which she described as a significant setback for the campaign. She provided a sharp critique, pointing out that Biden struggled to convey important policy messages, often stumbling over words and losing his train of thought. “He is a master of this material,” she noted, yet that mastery was lost amid his hesitations. She likened Biden’s struggle to articulate his points to a man fumbling in the dark—a stark contrast to Trump, who, according to her, weaponized his words, even as he spread misinformation.
In reflecting on the debate, Harris pointed out a specific moment that became emblematic of Biden’s lost composure. She recounted an instance in which he mistakenly claimed, “We finally beat Medicare,” a statement that left him sounding confused. Trump’s retort, noting that Biden had “beat it to death,” underscored the effectiveness of his jabs, while Biden’s inability to defend himself against them invited further ridicule.
The fallout from the debate wasn’t limited to public perception. Harris described the palpable outrage within the Biden camp, particularly during a watch party attended by her husband, Doug Emhoff. Rob Reiner’s explosive reaction highlighted the fears of many in the Democratic circle: “We’re going to lose our f—ing democracy and it’s your fault!” This incident illustrates not just the emotional weight of the moment but also the high stakes involved in the campaign.
As Harris prepared for media interviews following the debate, she grappled with how to present the truth without ignoring the realities of the situation. She likened her predicament to a Richard Pryor joke—“You gonna believe me or your lyin’ eyes?”—indicating the challenge of defending a faltering candidate while diverting attention to Trump’s own failings. She decided that her talking points would pivot toward criticizing Trump’s dishonesty rather than minimize Biden’s shortcomings.
Through her narration, Harris emphasized that the election is ultimately about substance, framing her critiques around Trump’s repeated lies and failure to stand firm on critical issues. She articulated concerns about Trump’s lack of clarity surrounding the events of January 6 and his stance on women’s rights, issues central to many voters’ decision-making processes.
Biden’s office has not commented on Harris’ revelations, which suggests a cautious approach to the fallout from the debate and the ongoing challenges of the campaign. As “107 Days” hits the bookshelves, it aims to illuminate the real pressures and challenges faced by the Biden-Harris team as they navigated a tumultuous political environment.
In examining these insights from Harris’ memoir, readers gain an understanding of the internal conflicts within a campaign under fire. Her candid reflections provide a unique perspective on the expectations of party loyalty in the face of undeniable disappointments, crystallizing the intricate dance between truth and politics that characterizes many electoral battles.
"*" indicates required fields
