In a compelling recent exchange on CNN, Kenny Xu, a board member of Students for Fair Admissions, confronted Abby Phillip over the persistent and controversial subject of affirmative action. In a scene reminiscent of classic journalism clashes, Xu challenged Phillip’s adherence to traditional narratives and woke ideology with solid facts and reasoned logic.
The interview, which aired on June 29, 2023, showcased the stark divide between those who defend current affirmative action policies and those who advocate for a race-neutral admissions process. Phillip attempted to cling to the notion that non-academic factors, such as socioeconomic status, should play a role in college admissions. She noted, “Colleges obviously care about grades and SAT scores, but they also are filling universities with people, human beings who have other factors that they bring to the table. Why is it not okay for them to consider those things?” However, Xu swiftly countered her argument, saying, “I’m saying, if you’re going to consider those things, you should consider them without respect to race.”
Xu’s approach was not merely confrontational; it was rooted in a desire for fairness in admissions processes. He asked, “How is that not something that colleges might have an interest in considering?” He then answered this question with striking clarity: “The reason why you shouldn’t consider that is because you should consider the success of an applicant because of affirmative action.” Here, Xu brought forth a compelling point about educational outcomes, noting that many Black Americans, particularly in rigorous fields like law, tend to graduate in the bottom quartile of their classes. His assertion was not an attack on individuals but rather a plea for higher standards that promote genuine success.
Continuing his point, Xu emphasized the importance of placing students in environments where they can truly thrive. “We want black students to succeed. We want every student to succeed, low-income students to succeed,” he stated. Xu advocated for maintaining rigorous admission standards rather than lowering them as a supposed means of equity. He warned, “Lowering your standard to admit somebody of a socioeconomic status or race would not help them do that.”
As the conversation progressed, Xu clearly articulated the implications of affirmative action policies and how they can inadvertently harm the very students they aim to assist. He argued, “In fact, it would harm their graduation rate and excellence,” highlighting that success in education should not be sacrificed on the altar of political correctness. By insisting on a standard based on merit, Xu was effectively calling for a level playing field in college admissions.
XU capped off his impressive performance by citing specific data to reinforce his stance. He pointed out the discrepancies in admissions statistics, saying, “The standard is lowered, as admissions data shows, an Asian has to score 273 points higher on the SAT to have the same chance of admission as a black person.” This stark comparison showcases the systemic issues within affirmative action policies and their ramifications on diverse applicant pools.
Clearly uncomfortable with the tide of the conversation, Phillip ended the segment abruptly, stating, “Kenny Xu, thank you for your perspective. We really appreciate it.” Her response indicated a rush to conclude the discussion rather than engage further with Xu’s compelling arguments, perhaps out of concern for losing ground in the debate.
This exchange on CNN reflects a broader conversation regarding how best to achieve true equality in higher education. The discussion is far from over, as many argue for a revamp of policies they believe inadvertently create more barriers than solutions. As such debates continue, the importance of maintaining an open mind and a reliance on facts cannot be overstated. Xu’s adept handling of the interview not only highlighted his positions but also served as a reminder of the questions that still need to be addressed regarding fairness and excellence in education.
"*" indicates required fields
