As summer comes to a close and we mark Labor Day, many Americans celebrate the creativity and hard work of everyday laborers. Unfortunately, union leaders seem to seize this occasion to promote their own agendas rather than honor the very workers they claim to represent. Each year, these union bosses leverage this holiday to push for greater government power, often at the expense of workers’ rights.
Today’s unions have a troubling foundation built on the government-backed ability to compel workers into membership. In the 24 states lacking right-to-work laws, union officials can legally pressure private sector workers to “pay up or be fired.” This coercion continues even in states where union membership is voluntary; workers’ wages and conditions are often negotiated by unions whether or not they wish to be represented. As the reality of the situation shows, union bureaucrats can extract dues from workers and use those funds for political influence, often advocating for causes that individual workers might oppose.
Although federal law does guarantee some limited rights for workers—like the right to ensure that their dues do not fund political activities (CWA v. Beck, 1988) and the right for public employees to avoid paying union dues (Janus v. AFSCME, 2018)—union officials are fighting to undermine these protections. They use the funds collected under duress to push a legislative agenda that seeks to eliminate these rights altogether. The Protecting the Right to Work Act, known as the PRO Act, stands as a prime example of this effort, aiming to dismantle the 26 state Right to Work laws through federal action.
Right to Work laws do not prevent any worker from joining a union voluntarily; rather, they safeguard a worker’s choice. Yet, union leaders view this as a threat to their control and seek to eradicate such protections. The provisions within the PRO Act further clarify this point, as they seek to legalize tactics that many already view as unacceptable or illegal. For instance, the controversial “card check” system replaces secret ballots with a process where organizers solicit signatures from workers in public, often under undue pressure. The AFL-CIO itself admitted that the collected cards may not accurately represent workers’ desires.
Another troubling tactic is the use of blocking charges to protect existing unions from decertification votes. Union officials can file unverified complaints against the employer to halt a decertification vote for months, even if all workers submit a petition to remove the union. Workers might unanimously oppose the union, yet the system allows union leaders to manipulate regulations to maintain their hold.
The current methods employed by union officials stand in stark contrast to the vision established by early union leaders. Samuel Gompers, the founder of the American Federation of Labor, firmly opposed coercion in a 1924 speech. He stated, “I want to urge devotion to the fundamentals of human liberty—the principles of voluntarism. No lasting gain has ever come from compulsion.” Gompers understood that when union support is voluntary, leaders must justify their relevance and effectiveness to individual members.
Today, however, many union officials disregard this foundational belief and instead compromise the freedoms of the very workers they are supposed to represent.
As Labor Day arrives, it serves as an important reminder that being truly “pro-worker” means challenging the narrative put forth by union leaders and advocating for a worker’s right to choose union affiliation freely. This holiday celebrates workers, not the self-serving tactics of union bosses. It is vital to recognize this distinction as we reflect upon the contributions of laborers. Labor Day should honor the spirit of individual workers, empowering them to make their own choices instead of being forced into union dominance.
"*" indicates required fields
