Left-wing terrorism has reached a peak not seen in three decades, according to new research from the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Although historically, violence from the right has overshadowed leftist attacks, recent patterns suggest a reversal. Their findings indicate an uptick in left-wing terrorism incidents and plots. Despite this rise, it remains crucial to note that these occurrences stem from previously low levels and still lag behind historical rates of violence from right-wing and jihadist factions.
The year 2025 stands out, marking the first instance in over 30 years where attacks attributed to left-wing terrorists have surpassed those associated with the far right. Despite the decline in right-wing violence this year, experts caution that it could easily escalate back to previous highs. Addressing both forms of extremism is imperative for effective counterterrorism strategies.
The study emphasizes the need for leaders from all political affiliations to condemn violent extremism. The authors stress that this includes rejecting the validity of such violence and reducing its allure. However, they also acknowledge that far-right terrorism has historically been more prevalent, though the definition of “right-wing” remains somewhat nebulous. Many attacks deemed right-wing are executed by individuals with distorted and inconsistent beliefs that do not neatly fit into conventional definitions of conservatism.
An illustrative case is the conviction of a man for attacking Paul Pelosi, husband of the former Speaker of the House. The media characterized him as a staunch Trump supporter; however, this portrayal may not accurately reflect reality.
Recent comments by Senator John Fetterman underscore this shifting narrative. He recently stated, “Left-wing terrorism climbs to 30-year high,” calling for members of his own party to stop labeling conservatives as “Hitler or fascist.” His remarks illustrate a growing concern among some Democrats about the inflammatory rhetoric that surrounds political discourse. “Political violence is always wrong—no exceptions. We must all turn the temperature down,” he asserted.
This conversation gains urgency in light of recent violent events, such as the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA. He was shot while hosting an event at Utah Valley University. The tragic incident emphasizes the ongoing risks linked to political activism and rhetoric.
Moreover, the designation of Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization by the President has drawn national attention. In an announcement, he stated, “I am pleased to inform our many U.S.A. Patriots that I am designating ANTIFA, A SICK, DANGEROUS, RADICAL LEFT DISASTER, AS A MAJOR TERRORIST ORGANIZATION.” This move points to the administration’s determination to confront what they see as extremist behaviors. He added, “I will also be strongly recommending that those funding ANTIFA be thoroughly investigated in accordance with the highest legal standards and practices.”
The study suggests that regardless of political leanings, the threat of domestic terrorism remains a critical issue. It urges a united front against extremism, reinforcing the idea that violence for any cause should not be tolerated. As these dynamics evolve, further discussion on the definitions and implications of political violence will continue to shape public perception and political dialogue.
"*" indicates required fields
