The Lie That Broke the Republic
In a pointed analysis, former Congressman Michael D. Bishop illuminates the profound consequences of a coordinated attack on a sitting president — which he argues began with Donald J. Trump’s election. He contends that the opposition was not merely political; it was an orchestrated campaign designed to undermine trust in the nation’s leadership and the institutions that support it.
Bishop asserts that the narrative of Russian collusion was not born out of genuine concern for national security, but rather a calculated deception driven by political operatives. He describes it as a “professional theater,” where fabricated narratives took center stage, manipulating public perception. Claims from media personalities and prominent politicians, like the vehement accusations from Rachel Maddow and Adam Schiff, illustrate this scheme, with Schiff notably promising evidence that never materialized. The echoes of such rhetoric, according to Bishop, contributed significantly to the delegitimization of Trump’s presidency.
On the first day Trump took office, the atmosphere was rife with tension, underscored by violent protests that Bishop labeled acts of “domestic political terrorism.” He recalls witnessing Antifa groups wreaking havoc, an event that starkly contrasted with the narrative the mainstream media portrayed. Bishop argues that while cities burned, the media sanitized the chaos, referring to violence as “mostly peaceful protests,” highlighting a disconnect between reality and reporting.
As he reflects on personal encounters with this politically charged environment, Bishop recounts a chilling incident in Alexandria, Virginia, where a leftist extremist opened fire on Republican lawmakers practicing for a charity baseball game. The attack, nearly fatal for his colleague Steve Scalise, showcased how anger stoked by media narratives could drive individuals to violence. Bishop suggests that this incident marks a critical turning point in recognizing that even the FBI, in its investigation, failed to acknowledge the political motivations behind the attack, opting for a sanitized version that distanced the crime from its clear political roots.
In subsequent years, Bishop continues his examination with a focus on how the fallout from the Russian collusion narrative had long-reaching effects. The media, he states, became a tool for ideological warfare, helping to demonize not just Trump but the entire Republican Party. The accusations against Republicans escalated to a point where candidates were forced to defend against fabricated narratives of guilt and complicity in various societal issues. This pervasive fear-mongering, as Bishop highlights, worked effectively for Democrats in the 2018 midterms, leading to a staggering shift in power.
Bishop’s reflection emphasizes how this ongoing narrative of division and chaos is not merely a backdrop but an essential element of political strategy. He argues that the groundwork laid by the Russian collusion claims fostered an environment of mistrust that allowed for a wide range of conspiracies and unfounded allegations against Republicans. The culmination of these attacks led to a Democratic takeover, which, according to Bishop, produced little in terms of substantive policy changes, further validating his claim that the essence of the opposition has been about power rather than genuine governance.
Looking back, Bishop articulates a resolute need for accountability. He calls for an examination of those who perpetuated the lies that ignited the discord and degradation of institutional trust. As he notes, enduring damage has been inflicted on American society, resulting in a deep rift in how citizens perceive their government and each other. With a plea for transparency and justice, he underscores the belief that those responsible for the deception must face consequences. His assertion is clear: restoring integrity within the system is non-negotiable if the nation is to move forward.
In conclusion, Bishop’s analysis serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of trust in democratic institutions. He delineates a path forward grounded in accountability, resonating with the foundational principles that constitute the Republic. As he states, the American people deserve the truth — a truth unfettered by political gain and free from manipulation by those tasked with upholding the integrity of the nation.
"*" indicates required fields
