Recently, Federal Housing Finance Agency Director William Pulte shared a video that raises serious questions about Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook’s integrity. Pulte argues that the footage serves as evidence of Cook’s involvement in mortgage fraud. Cook, who was appointed by President Biden, was fired by Trump last month due to allegations concerning discrepancies in two mortgages taken out in 2021. She supposedly declared both a home in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and a condo in Atlanta, Georgia, as her primary residence—an act that could have significant implications since loans for primary residences often come with more favorable terms than those for second homes or investment properties.
Despite her dismissal, Cook has not stepped down from her position. The Federal Reserve continues to support her, asserting that she may remain while pursuing a lawsuit against Trump for what she claims was an unlawful termination. The situation took a turn when Pulte posted a video featuring journalist Charlie Duff attempting to contact Cook at her Ann Arbor property. A man who answered the door stated, “No, we’re just renting. You’ll have to talk to the owner.” This exchange raises a critical question: if Cook is renting out a property she claims as her primary residence, what does that say about her disclosures to the government?
Pulte remarked, “We have just received video proof that Lisa Cook’s declared ‘PRIMARY RESIDENCE’ is being RENTED out to tenants.” He continued by questioning, “Cook RECENTLY CLAIMED to the U.S. Government that it was her PERSONAL RESIDENCE, but she’s renting it out?” The implication of such claims is clear: there are fundamental discrepancies that warrant further investigation.
In a press conference at the White House, when asked why he proceeded with a criminal referral despite Cook’s firing, Pulte pointed out, “Because once we dug in more, we found more.” According to him, her disclosures to the government misclassified properties. He noted, “She said she had a second home, but then in her disclosures to the U.S. government, she called it an investment and rental property.” The distinction between primary and rental properties is crucial, particularly regarding interest rates and the accuracy of financial applications.
Pulte elaborated on the timeline of Cook’s mortgage applications, stating that she declared two properties in different states as primary residences within a matter of weeks. “She declares both of them as her primary residence,” he explained. Additionally, Pulte mentioned a third property where Cook had labeled it as a second home, counter to its classification as an investment property. “3 strikes and you’re out,” he concluded, referring to the severity of the allegations against Cook.
Furthermore, Pulte emphasized the responsibility that comes with Cook’s position at the Federal Reserve. “If you’re going to be in charge of the Federal Reserve, damn you better sure know how to fill out a mortgage application,” he asserted. This statement reflects growing concerns about Cook’s qualifications to serve in such a pivotal role, especially as Trump has continually expressed dissatisfaction with the Federal Reserve’s handling of interest rates, which he perceives as too high compared to other nations.
In a note directed at Chairman Jerome Powell, Trump criticized his management of the Federal Reserve, stating, “You have cost the USA a fortune — and continue to do so.” Trump’s frustrations with Powell seem to resonate within Republican circles, with Senator Bernie Moreno of Ohio highlighting the financial burden on taxpayers due to the Federal Reserve’s interest rate policies.
This unfolding narrative highlights a troubling intersection of accountability and governance at a government institution critical to the nation’s economy. Pulte’s actions and the subsequent fallout underscore a need for transparency in governmental operations, particularly in financial matters where misrepresentations can have far-reaching consequences for American taxpayers.
"*" indicates required fields
