In a troubling development for election integrity in Michigan, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson has unveiled new regulations that critics claim make it easier for political manipulation to occur. These rules come at a time when transparency in voting processes is crucial. Phani Mantravadi, founder of Check My Vote, has voiced his vehement opposition to these measures, arguing that they serve to protect systemic flaws rather than correct them.
Benson stands accused of attempting to obscure significant issues surrounding voter rolls. According to Mantravadi, she is orchestrating a campaign to distract Michiganders from the real story behind “125,428 excess votes” cast in the recent election. He asserts that Benson is keen to keep the details of a reported glitch under wraps. “Jocelyning” Benson, as he refers to her, seems intent on overlooking the discrepancies between the Qualified Voter File (QVF) from the state and that from local elections—discrepancies that raised alarms among those monitoring election integrity.
The issue doesn’t end there. Mantravadi’s organization faces additional obstacles in their efforts to clean up voter rolls. As he explains, “If she really wants to address the problems being brought to light… one would think she would welcome solutions such as CheckMyVote.org.” Yet, Benson’s administration has instead designated multiple tools for voter roll maintenance, such as Check My Vote, as “unreliable.” This stance fuels suspicion about her intentions—if transparency truly is the goal, why opt to suppress helpful contributions from independent groups?
Mantravadi cites specific concerns about the data formats provided to his organization for processing. The irregularities, such as files arriving malformed and missing crucial voting method data, make it increasingly difficult for Check My Vote to fulfill its mission. “The absentee report file format has been changed drastically… I spent weeks rewriting my code to suit their seemingly whimsical format changes,” he explained. According to him, these alterations hinder not only his organization’s ability to address voter roll accuracy but also cast doubt on the overall effort for election integrity.
Upcoming hearings concerning these new administrative rules further highlight the contentious nature of election management in Michigan. The proposed regulations would impose stringent standards, such as requiring notarized affidavits for every challenged registration, thus complicating or even stalling the efforts of groups like Check My Vote. “These rules handcuff the clerks and create a bureaucratic quagmire,” remarked Patrice Johnson from the Michigan Fair Elections Institute, underlining the negative impact on clerks’ efficiency.
Moreover, Benson’s tactics appear more punitive than constructive. Rather than fostering an environment where community organizations can aid in maintaining accurate voter lists, her administration’s approach utilizes intimidation and regulatory barriers to effectively silence dissenting voices. The aim seems clear: maintain the status quo, even if it means risking the integrity of the election process itself.
The unfolding situation raises critical questions about accountability in Michigan’s electoral framework. Benson’s administration’s refusal to collaborate with grassroots organizations is worrying, as it suggests a defensive posture rather than a commitment to addressing existing problems. Coupled with the outcomes of Benson’s past lawsuits—at least nine losses that challenge her methods—one can’t help but wonder how much transparency and integrity are truly valued in the current political climate.
As more Michiganders prepare to voice their opinions in the upcoming hearing, the focus will be on whether these new rules serve to enhance or undermine election integrity. Mantravadi and his fellow advocates remain steadfast in their commitment to keeping the spotlight on the pressing need for accurate voter roll management in Michigan. In a state pivotal to the electoral landscape, the stakes couldn’t be higher.
"*" indicates required fields
