The National Archives issued an apology to Mikie Sherrill after her military records were released to an unauthorized individual, Nicholas De Gregorio. This incident surfaced amid the gubernatorial race in New Jersey, where Sherrill is the Democratic candidate. CBS News noted that De Gregorio is connected to Republican candidate Jack Ciattarelli, who is challenging Sherrill in the election.
In a letter, NPRC Director Scott Levins expressed regret for the breach, stating, “On behalf of the National Archives, I sincerely apologize for the inconvenience and aggravation this situation may cause you.” He revealed that the unauthorized release included sensitive details such as Sherrill’s social security number. Levins referred to the breach as “exceedingly rare” and offered her “free credit monitoring services” as a precaution.
Sherrill criticized the Army’s actions, characterizing the release as an unlawful weaponization of government resources. She remarked, “This is an illegal and dangerous weaponization of the federal government.” Her claims suggest significant concern over the impact this breach might have on veterans’ privacy and safety.
The National Archives assured Sherrill that they would hold staff accountable and review policies to prevent such incidents in the future. Levins emphasized the need for additional training to ensure the safeguarding of personal information related to veterans.
Amid the political tensions, President Trump, supporting Ciattarelli, brushed off Sherrill’s claims and criticized her competence, calling her “close to incompetent.” This clash hints at the heightened stakes in the gubernatorial race, as both candidates grapple with public perceptions and controversies surrounding their campaigns.
Ciattarelli, previously defeated in the 2021 gubernatorial election, seeks to flip the state from Democratic control. The situation illustrates the complexities of modern political campaigns, where personal information and privacy can become focal points for political strategy and public debate.
As this story unfolds, the implications of government mishandling of personal information may resonate beyond individual election cycles, potentially shaking voter trust in not only the candidates but also the institutions that manage sensitive data.
"*" indicates required fields
