The North Carolina GOP is making a push for accountability in the state’s judicial system, specifically targeting Magistrate Judge Teresa Stokes. This movement comes on the heels of a tragic event involving Decarlos Brown, a felon with a long criminal history. Stokes released Brown on a written promise to appear in court before he went on to murder Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska.
Congressman Tim Moore (R-NC) has been vocal about his disapproval, stating, “This tragedy was preventable. There must be accountability. North Carolinians deserve better.” He spearheaded a letter urging for Stokes’s removal under North Carolina General Statute § 7A-173(a), which allows for the removal of a magistrate who fails to perform their duties or conducts themselves in a manner that brings disrepute to the judicial office.
In their correspondence, the GOP lawmakers pointed out that her actions clearly qualify as both grounds for dismissal. “Magistrate Stokes’s actions in the case of Decarlos Brown, Jr. clearly meet both of these grounds for removal,” they asserted, emphasizing the dangerous precedent set by her leniency.
The response from Chief District Court Judge Roy Wiggins has drawn criticism as lacking substance. His letter expressed sadness regarding Zarutska’s death, but it failed to directly address the concerns raised about Stokes’s judgment. Instead, Wiggins stated he would review local bond policies and engage in educational efforts for magistrates about assessing the risks associated with pretrial release. His vague assurances raised more eyebrows than confidence.
Rep. Mark Harris (R-NC), another supporter of the removal effort, did not hold back in expressing his frustration on social media. He shared Wiggins’s statement and remarked pointedly about the situation, questioning Stokes’s ability to serve effectively when, according to him, she has “lost the public’s confidence.” He added, “The District Court says they are ‘reviewing’ and ‘evaluating’ policies and procedures. But is Stokes still making judgments for other criminals?” This sentiment highlights a growing concern among constituents regarding judicial accountability and the implications of such decisions on community safety.
As this situation unfolds, it raises serious questions about judicial discretion and responsibility. GOP leaders are rallying for change, aiming for a judicial system that prioritizes public safety and community trust. The collective voice is clear: accountability in the courts is not just an ideal; it is a necessity for the well-being of North Carolinians.
"*" indicates required fields
