A recent investigation has stirred significant debate surrounding the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), highlighting its substantial financial ties to U.S. taxpayers. According to newly revealed data, the European Union (EU) allocated over €600,000 to the OCCRP immediately following the 2024 European elections. Critics argue that this funding, despite being publicly justified as supporting “investigative journalism,” is in fact a mechanism for partisan attacks against EU-critical politicians.
The OCCRP, with its roots in the U.S., reportedly receives approximately half of its funding from American sources, including the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the State Department’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs. This has raised questions about the organization’s true independence and the motivations behind its reporting.
Petr Bystron, an AfD Member of the European Parliament, voiced serious concerns about the OCCRP’s influence, stating, “The biggest media scandal in post-war history is brewing here.” He criticized the OCCRP for allegedly using EU funds to “spread negative information about EU-critical politicians without verification,” suggesting that their reporting strategically undermined specific candidates. Bystron pointed to the impact their coverage had on election outcomes, as some parties and politicians saw significant drops in support. Notably, Bystron himself was a target of this series of reports, which eventually led to police searches of his home without yielding any evidence.
The investigation reveals that the OCCRP’s activities have been linked to instances of political interference in multiple EU states. Such actions were notably present during the campaign that adversely affected Dutch politician Thierry Baudet and led to the collapse of the Austrian government after the infamous “Ibiza Affair” in 2019. This pattern raises alarming questions about the role of foreign funding in shaping electoral politics in Europe.
Evidence from the past suggests that the OCCRP has had a hand in politically charged events, including efforts that led to the impeachment proceedings against a former U.S. President. Such revelations point to a broader trend wherein investigative journalism is used not merely for uncovering corruption but as a tool in partisan strategies. Critics argue that the OCCRP’s funding and operation resemble less of an independent journalistic endeavor and more of a politically motivated campaign.
The implications of these findings extend beyond the mere funding of journalism. If the OCCRP can influence election outcomes through targeted reporting, it could fundamentally alter the political landscape within the EU. As Bystron pointed out, the ultimate goal appears to be the elimination of EU-critical voices from the political arena, raising concerns about democratic processes and free expression across Europe.
As this investigation unfolds, the accountability of organizations like the OCCRP, which operates with substantial taxpayer dollars, must be scrutinized. Transparency regarding their funding sources is essential to ensuring that journalistic integrity is upheld. Such developments serve as a reminder that not all journalism is created equal…some may serve specific interests rather than the public good.
"*" indicates required fields
