Päivi Räsänen, a longstanding member of the Finnish Parliament, faces renewed legal challenges stemming from a tweet she posted six years ago. In 2019, Räsänen criticized the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland for its involvement in an LGBT Pride event, questioning, “How does the doctrinal foundation of the Church fit in with shame and sin being raised as a matter of pride?” She referenced a Bible passage from Romans 1, which speaks on the consequences of sin. This led to her being charged with “agitation against a minority group” in 2021.
Now, Räsänen’s case is set for a Finnish Supreme Court hearing on October 30, 2025. She shares the legal spotlight with Lutheran Bishop Juhana Pohjola, who published a pamphlet authored by Räsänen in 2004, outlining the Christian perspective on marriage. Interestingly, two lower courts already acquitted both of them of all charges, yet the Supreme Court’s decision will ultimately determine the outcome.
Paul Coleman, the executive director of ADF International, expressed concern regarding the implications of Räsänen’s prosecution. “It is shocking that after two unanimous acquittals, Päivi Räsänen is again being dragged to court to defend her fundamental right to freedom of speech,” he stated. Coleman argued that vague hate speech laws can lead to ideological prosecutions, a phenomenon evident in Räsänen’s case. His comments reflect a broader anxiety regarding freedom of speech in contemporary society. “In a free and democratic society, all should be allowed to share their beliefs without fear of punishment,” he emphasized.
Räsänen, a medical doctor and grandmother of twelve, stands firmly by her words. She rebuffed the concept that posting a Bible verse constituted an offense, asserting, “It isn’t a crime to tweet a Bible verse, or to engage in public discourse from a Christian perspective.” She has endured a trying period in her life, striving to defend her beliefs while navigating the complexities of the legal system. “The attempts to criminalize me for expressing my beliefs have resulted in an immensely trying last few years, but I still hope for a positive result that will stand as a key precedent to protect the human right to free speech in Finland,” she remarked.
This situation is not isolated. Other European nations are also grappling with issues surrounding freedom of expression. In the UK, several Christians who prayed outside abortion clinics have faced arrest and prosecution. Such actions have sparked significant international concern regarding the freedom to express religious beliefs. At the Munich Security Conference, Vice President J.D. Vance openly condemned these prosecutions, framing them as examples of a broader trend where free speech is increasingly under threat. “Naturally, the government urged readers to report any fellow citizens suspected guilty of thoughtcrime,” Vance highlighted, framing Europe’s current atmosphere as one where free speech is in retreat.
The implications of Räsänen’s case and those like it extend beyond national borders. As societal norms evolve and clash with traditional values, the continued erosion of free speech rights presents a significant challenge. Political leaders and activists alike are watching intently, recognizing that the decisions made in these courtrooms will resonate far beyond Finnish jurisdiction.
While the legal battles unfold, Räsänen’s conviction to stand for her beliefs remains a focal point of this ongoing discourse on freedom of expression. She reflects a significant struggle that is representative of many others facing similar legal challenges in a rapidly changing landscape. The outcome of her Supreme Court hearing will not just affect her, but may also establish precedents impacting the discourse surrounding free speech across Europe and beyond.
"*" indicates required fields
