A Pennsylvania Democratic House candidate, Bob Harvie, faces serious allegations regarding the use of taxpayer funds. According to a report by the Washington Free Beacon, Harvie, who currently chairs the Bucks County Board of Commissioners, directed $13,500 from the county’s Opioid Settlement Fund to Planned Parenthood Keystone. This money was earmarked for transporting minors to the Rainbow Room, a local center focused on serving LGBTQ youth, rather than assisting those recovering from opioid addiction.
The funds, approved in December, facilitated transport for high school students to various Rainbow Room activities. One such event included a seminar focusing on sexual education and related topics that many would consider inappropriate for minors, especially considering the reported content such as “SEX ED NIGHT / M*STURB*TION.” This seminar, held in May 2024, featured a promotional pamphlet that depicted a woman’s hand on a watermelon, an image meant to represent female anatomy. Critics note the troubling implications of using public money to support this kind of programming.
The Rainbow Room also hosted a “Queer Prom” in 2023. Reports indicate that participants as young as 13 received goody bags containing condoms, lubricant, and dental dams, items designed for safe sex practices. In addition to these events, the center has offered seminars on transgender identity, aiming to introduce concepts of social and medical transition to children as young as 14. Such initiatives raise concerns among parents and community members regarding their appropriateness and the role of government funding in such endeavors.
Harvie’s connection to Planned Parenthood and the funding of these programs comes amid a broader controversy regarding his actions as a county commissioner. He is implicated in defying a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling related to counting ballots. Reports indicate that he and fellow commissioner Diane Marseglia openly acknowledged voting to count ballots that were deemed illegal according to the court’s directive. Marseglia was quoted as saying, “We all know that precedent by a court doesn’t matter anymore in this country,” showcasing a blatant disregard for legal authority.
The allegations against Harvie reveal not only a contentious relationship with the judicial system but also a troubling prioritization of controversial issues over pressing local needs like opioid recovery. The use of funds originally intended for addiction recovery to support gender identity workshops sends a stark message about the direction of local governance. Critics argue this further reflects how elected officials may use taxpayer resources for personal or political agendas rather than addressing the immediate challenges facing their constituents.
With these controversies swirling, Harvie’s campaign faces a critical juncture. The community response underscores a potential backlash against perceived misuse of public funds and a stark divide on social issues. As voters begin to assess his record, including these recent decisions, Harvie’s prospects may hinge on the public’s perception of accountability and responsible governance.
"*" indicates required fields
