Golf icon Phil Mickelson has made headlines after his recent posts on X, where he targeted several House Democrats, specifically calling for Rep. Ilhan Omar to be sent back to Somalia. This urgent appeal came in the wake of the assassination of Charlie Kirk, where Democrats and mainstream media were quick to label him as radical and irredeemably racist.
Omar, who fled Somalia with her family in 1995, made comments during an interview with CNN’s Kaitlan Collins that sparked Mickelson’s ire. She stated, “It’s one thing to care about his life because obviously so many people loved him… But I am not going to sit here and be judged for not wanting to honor any legacy this man has left behind.” Her dismissal of Kirk’s legacy, suggesting it belongs “in the dustbin of history,” drew Mickelson’s sharp rebuke.
Mickelson responded by posting on his X account, expressing his view that Omar “spews hate every time she opens her mouth.” He didn’t shy away from stating he believed she came to the U.S. fraudulently and expressed a hope that she would soon be deported. This direct confrontation underscores the tensions surrounding Omar’s political statements and public persona, a source of considerable controversy.
In a different but related instance, Erika Kirk publicly forgave her husband’s assassin during his memorial service, a moment that resonated with many who witnessed it. Mickelson highlighted her words, stating, “While Ilhan and Jasmine are speaking hateful rhetoric, Erika Kirk is saying this. I have no words. Amazing.” Erika characterized her husband Charlie’s wishes, reflecting on her belief that he would have wanted to “save young men, just like the one who took his life,” a poignant statement of forgiveness amidst chaos.
The events continued as Mickelson turned his attention to another Democrat, Rep. Jasmine Crockett from Texas. In a CNN interview, Crockett insisted on using incendiary rhetoric that she believed accurately described Republicans. “I am using that language because it is accurate language,” she asserted, even drawing a comparison to Adolf Hitler. Mickelson’s reaction was swift, directing harsh criticism toward both Omar and Crockett. He stated plainly that their words are filled with hate and that they “are the problem, certainly aren’t the solution, and they both need to go.”
The exchanges illustrate a growing divide in political rhetoric and the personal animosities that can arise in the heated arena of social media and public discourse. Mickelson’s strong response shows how public figures are increasingly willing to speak out against what they see as damaging narratives perpetuated by elected officials.
As Mickelson continues to engage in these discussions, the impact of his comments reflects a desire for accountability and clarity in political conversations. The juxtaposition between Erika Kirk’s message of forgiveness and the vitriol expressed by the other politicians highlights a critical moment in public dialogue about morality, leadership, and responsibility. In this contentious environment, voices like Mickelson’s serve as reminders of the passionate debates that fuel contemporary political life.
"*" indicates required fields
