A recently surfaced video has stirred outrage as it shows a U.S. State Department employee, identified as Preston Jacobs, making shocking comments about the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The video was uncovered by Senior Editor Jack Posobiec, who highlighted Jacobs’ remarks that reflect a disturbing lack of empathy and a troubling attitude toward violence.
In the video, Jacobs gleefully states, “Oh, God. And the f***ing whitewashing of… And let’s be very clear here, the world is a better place without Charlie Kirk.” His vitriol escalates as he describes Kirk as a “f***ing ghoul” and claims, “thank goodness he is out of this world.” Such unabashedly hostile language raises serious questions about the mindset of an individual employed by the government, particularly one who benefits from taxpayer dollars.
Jacobs continues, expressing mock sympathy for Kirk’s daughters, only to revert to celebrating the man’s demise, stating, “That guy was a piece of sh** and the world is a much better place without him. Okay?” This inherent contradiction—feigning concern while reveling in a public figure’s death—speaks to an alarming normalization of violent rhetoric among certain sectors of society.
His comments were made in a dismissive tone, tempered with assertions that he does not condone violence. Still, the eerie laughter accompanying his statements implies a disconnect between his social responsibility as a civil servant and the inflammatory views he espoused. “Now, again, I do not support violence,” he insists, just moments after celebrating Kirk’s assassination.
The fallout has been rapid. Following the video’s release, the Men of the West YouTube channel, where Jacobs has previously appeared, publicly distanced itself from his statements. They expressed horror at Jacobs’ remarks and declared they would cease any collaboration with him. “I fully disavow the comments made by Preston Jacobs about a recent tragedy,” they posted, emphasizing the need to separate their content from his toxic views. The agreement to pull or privatize previous collaborations indicates a collective effort to distance the channel from Jacobs’ remarks.
This incident raises broader concerns regarding the integrity and character of those in government positions. How can the public trust individuals funded by taxpayers when they openly celebrate violence and express gleeful disdain for fellow Americans? Jacobs’ comments are not just a personal issue, but rather reflect a possible cultural sentiment within some segments of the government, making it imperative to scrutinize who is given authority in public office.
In this case, the disavowal of Jacobs by fellow content creators underscores a need for accountability. While entertainment and opinion can often tread into the provocative, there should be a clear line when it comes to the celebration of violence, particularly by those representing the public.
Ultimately, Jacobs’ video serves as a stark reminder: it is not enough to denounce violence in words; the actions surrounding such events must reflect a true commitment to civility and respect for human life. The celebration of an assassination, regardless of political affiliation, is a step towards a dangerous moral threshold that society must resist crossing.
"*" indicates required fields
