In late September, Quebec Premier François Legault and Secularism Minister Jean-François Roberge announced plans for a new law prohibiting public prayer. Roberge framed this initiative as a response to the increasing occurrence of what he described as “street prayer,” which has gained notoriety during recent pro-Hamas and pro-Palestinian demonstrations. This form of prayer has transformed from a peaceful act of devotion into a spectacle that interrupts daily life, blocking streets and entrances and creating an atmosphere of intimidation.
Legault stated simply, “When you want to pray, you go in a church or a mosque—not in a public place.” Roberge echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that such practices create unease, undermine neutrality, and threaten public order. This proposal recalls Bill 21, Quebec’s contentious law passed in 2019 that prevents public-sector employees from wearing religious symbols, reiterating the province’s commitment to secularism (laïcité).
Unsurprisingly, civil liberties groups and prominent Muslim leaders have voiced their discontent. The Canadian Civil Liberties Association argued that this ban infringes upon the rights to religion, expression, and assembly as protected by Canada’s Charter. The Canadian Muslim Forum described the proposed legislation as stigmatizing, while Montreal Archbishop Christian Lépine declared that banning public prayer would be “like forbidding thought itself.”
This rhetoric often sidesteps a crucial point: public prayer, especially in this context, is not merely a private matter. It’s an assertion of power in shared spaces, transforming prayer into a political act rather than a personal devotion. It is essential to recognize that this perspective is not Islamophobic but rather aligns with a deeper understanding within Islamic teachings. The Prophet Muhammad warned against praying in the middle of the road—highlighting that prayer should not disrupt or endanger others.
The implications here extend beyond legal frameworks. These mass public prayers align disturbingly with political demonstrations frequently characterized by antisemitic rhetoric. In cities from Toronto to London, prayer gatherings have been strategically deployed as displays of power rather than expressions of faith. Voices within the Muslim community have begun to challenge these trends. Raheel Raza, a Canadian Muslim journalist, argues that faith should remain a personal endeavor rather than a mechanism for public coercion.
Mohammed Rizwan, another Canadian Muslim commentator, laments the politicization of public prayer, calling it “a deliberate act to provoke and divide.” These insights counter the simplistic and harmful narrative that conflates Islam with extremism and misuses faith for political gain. They remind us that criticism of radical political Islam can coexist with respect for the core tenets of Islam itself.
Looking ahead, a constitutional showdown seems inevitable. Previous case law, notably the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in *Mouvement laïque québécois v. Saguenay*, confirmed that municipal prayers are incompatible with the requirement for government neutrality. Thus, Quebec finds itself on an established legal path, addressing religious expression’s role within public institutions. There’s a possibility that the government may again rely on the notwithstanding clause to protect this law from Charter challenges.
Some may label this move authoritarian, but the real authoritarianism rests with those who misuse public spaces for political displays disguised as religious expression. The stakes here extend beyond legalities; they touch on the cultural integrity of Quebec and similar civic environments worldwide. Public spaces must uphold neutrality, and surrendering them to any ideological or religious spectacle undermines the concept of a collective civic life.
Secularism does not equate to intolerance. Rather, it forms the bedrock of equal freedom, safeguarding individuals irrespective of their beliefs. This proposed legislation is not a hindrance to prayer but a reinforcement of the public square’s integrity, indicating where worship may properly occur. Streets bear a different purpose—they belong to the public at large.
In asserting clarity between right and wrong, Quebec is championing a significant truth: worship that obstructs community life by evoking division has no rightful place in civic domains. This legislative development may provoke controversy and confrontations, but it also signifies a determined stance against allowing political Islam to redefine public life. Laïcité embodies not only an idea but serves as a protective measure for civil society. Quebec is poised to uphold this principle once again.
"*" indicates required fields
