A woman in Texas has stirred controversy after allegedly infiltrating a high school group chat for students looking to establish a local chapter of Turning Point USA. This adult then used a large private Facebook group to mobilize members, seeking to intimidate both students and teachers involved in the initiative. The events unfolded within the Spring Branch Independent School District (SBISD) in Houston, highlighting a troubling incident of adult intervention in a youth-led effort.
In a Facebook group with over 700 members titled “Be The Change SBISD,” a user named Nathalie Herpin prompted others to actively contact teachers who were supporting the new Turning Point chapter. “Please, please send a letter with your own words to these two teachers, encourage them to focus on their careers, their students, and actual education,” Herpin wrote, emphasizing a narrative that sought to discourage any endorsement of the organization.
Herpin’s posts included alarming claims regarding students’ backgrounds, suggesting that support for Turning Point USA could cause irreparable harm to vulnerable demographics. “Remind them that they have students who are girls, who are black, who are Muslim, who are LGBTQ+, who have been raped, who have been abused, who have lost loved ones to gun violence – and those students would be irreparably harmed by their teachers’ support of an organization that has historically supported hate and division,” she noted. This framing illustrates a strong resistance to the Turning Point message, which the group views as controversial.
The situation intensified with accusations that adults in the community were doxxing students who were discussing the creation of the club in their private GroupMe chats. The term “doxxing” refers to publicly revealing or publishing private information about individuals, often leading to intimidation or harassment. One post from the Moms for Liberty group in Harris County called the actions “REPREHENSIBLE,” emphasizing that these actions targeted minors.
In the wake of this incident, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton expressed his office’s intention to review the messages exchanged within the Facebook group. He characterized the individuals involved as “sick” and declared a need to combat what he termed a “radical leftist culture of suppression.” This paints a stark picture of ongoing tensions between opposing ideological groups in educational settings.
Moreover, Herpin made claims that the assassination of Turning Point founder Charlie Kirk on September 10 was influenced by “right-wing rhetoric.” She indicated that a recent murder created a climate of fear around the idea of establishing school chapters for conservative groups, rather than purely focusing on educational values. Such assertions further illustrate the heightened emotional stakes in this debate, complicating the discourse surrounding educational initiatives and political expression in schools.
Andrew Kolvet, a spokesman for Turning Point USA, condemned the actions of the adults involved, calling the situation “truly disgraceful.” He highlighted the manipulation and intimidation tactics being utilized against students simply trying to express their political affiliations. Kolvet’s comments reinforce the concern that adults are overstepping their bounds, impacting students’ rights to organize and advocate for their beliefs within academic environments.
This occurrence may serve as a critical case study of the ongoing struggle within American educational systems where political ideologies clash. The actions taken against students involved in Turning Point USA reflect a broader dissatisfaction with how political discussions and associations are handled in schools. It raises questions about the appropriateness of adult involvement in these youth-led groups, and whether intimidation truly serves a constructive purpose.
As the investigation unfolds, there are calls for clarity and accountability. Observers are watching closely to see how the legal implications of the case develop and what consequences may arise from such actions against students and teachers alike. This incident may ultimately frame the future of political activity and expression in schools across the country, especially in contexts where divisive opinions are palpable.
"*" indicates required fields
